• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Developing a Machine-Learning Model to Predict Clash Resolution Options

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    10.1061-JCCEE5.CPENG-5548.pdf (2.574Mb)
    Date
    2024/03/01
    Author
    Ashit Harode
    Walid Thabet
    Xinghua Gao
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Even with the utilization of software tools like Navisworks to automate clash detection, clash resolution in construction projects remains a slow and manual process. The reason is the meticulous nature of the process where coordinators need to ensure that resolving one clash does not lead to new clashes. The use of machine learning to automate clash resolution as a potential option to improve the clash resolution process has been suggested with research showing positive results to support the implementation. While the research shows high accuracy in predicting clash resolution options to support automation, the scope limits the discussion on the complex and often lengthy process of developing a machine-learning model. Based on this research gap, the authors in this paper discuss the development of a prediction model to identify clash resolution options for given clashes. The discussion is focused on individual steps involved in creating machine-learning models like data collection, data preprocessing, and machine-learning algorithm development and selection. The authors also address common challenges in the development of machine-learning models including class imbalance and availability of limited data. The authors utilize a multilabel synthetic oversampling method to generate different percentages of synthetic data to account for class imbalance and limited data sets. Using this data set, the authors trained five machine-learning algorithms and reported on their accuracy. The authors concluded that increasing the data set with 20% synthetic data, and using an artificial neural network to develop the machine-learning model to automate the resolution of clashes have generated better results with an average accuracy of around 80%.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4297334
    Collections
    • Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV