• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Bridge Engineering
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Bridge Engineering
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Manual Estimation of Elastic Lateral Torsional Buckling Resistance of I-Section Members with Cross-Section Transitions

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    %28ASCE%29BE.1943-5592.0001931.pdf (979.5Kb)
    Date
    2022/10/01
    Author
    Ryan Slein
    Ryan J. Sherman
    Donald W. White
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    This paper presents the evaluation of three methods for manually estimating the elastic lateral-torsional buckling (LTB) resistance of general doubly and singly symmetric I-section members having any combination of transitions (steps) in the cross-section plate dimensions along the unbraced length. The study focuses on common unbraced lengths having idealized torsionally simply supported (fork) end conditions. Method 1 is a simple procedure specified in the AASHTO LRFD Specifications. Method 2 is a recently published procedure that seeks to estimate the LTB resistance via a length-weighted average cross-section approach. Method 3 is an extension of an approach that has been shown to be accurate and efficient for doubly and singly symmetric prismatic I-section members. Method 3 addresses a wide range of nonprismatic I-section member geometries and is recommended in AISC-MBMA Design Guide 25 2nd edition. Results from all three methods are evaluated by an extensive parametric study of I-girder unbraced lengths having various single or multiple cross-section transitions. On average, Method 2 provides the best predictions for single-curvature bending cases; however, certain cases are shown to exhibit undesirable unconservative errors. Method 3 provides the best predictions of the three methods for reverse-curvature bending cases, although the predictions tend to be highly conservative. This method gives slightly more conservative results than Method 2 for single-curvature bending cases, and it limits the worst-case unconservative errors to 7%.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4289068
    Collections
    • Journal of Bridge Engineering

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV