• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering and Science in Medical Diagnostics and Therapy
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering and Science in Medical Diagnostics and Therapy
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Harvesting Brain Signal Using Machine Learning Methods

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    jesmdt_005_01_011005.pdf (5.570Mb)
    Date
    2022
    Author
    Matsuno, Kevin
    Nandikolla, Vidya
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Brain computer interface (BCI) systems are developed in the biomedical engineering fields to increase the quality of life among patients with paralysis and neurological conditions. The development of a six class BCI controller to operate a semi-autonomous mobile robotic arm is presented. The controller uses the following mental tasks: imagined left/right hand squeeze, imagined left/right foot tap, rest, and a physical jaw clench. To design a controller, the locations of active electrodes are verified, and an appropriate machine learning algorithm is determined. Three subjects, ages ranging between 22 and 27, participated in five sessions of motor imagery experiments to record their brainwaves. These recordings were analyzed using event related potential (ERP) plots and topographical maps to determine active electrodes. bcilab was used to train two, three, five, and six class BCI controllers using linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and relevance vector machine (RVM) machine learning methods. The subjects' data were used to compare the two-method's performance in terms of error rate percentage. While a two class BCI controller showed the same accuracy for both methods, the three and five class BCI controllers showed the RVM approach having a higher accuracy than the LDA approach. For the five-class controller, error rate percentage was 33.3% for LDA and 29.2% for RVM. The six class BCI controller error rate percentage for both LDA and RVM was 34.5%. While the percentage values are the same, RVM was chosen as the desired machine learning algorithm based on the trend seen in the three and five class controller performances.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4285465
    Collections
    • Journal of Engineering and Science in Medical Diagnostics and Therapy

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV