• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Retail Load Defection Impacts on a Major Electric Utility′s Exposure to Weather Risk

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    (ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001531.pdf (1001.Kb)
    Date
    2021-12-28
    Author
    Yufei Su
    Jordan Kern
    Gregory W. Characklis
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Electric power utilities face a wide range of risks that cause financial uncertainty, with potential impacts on prices for customers. Among these, weather variability and retail load defection are perhaps two of the most studied. Whereas weather extremes expose utilities to unpredictable swings in electricity supply and demand, retail load defection, in which customers adopt distributed energy resources or switch to alternative providers, can alter utility business models fundamentally. We showed for the first time that these two phenomena can interact dynamically, with potential negative consequences for electricity ratepayers. We found that retail load defection could alter utilities’ financial exposure to weather risk in a matter of years. Using open-source power system simulation software coupled with a utility financial model, we simulated outcomes for a major hydropower-producing California electric utility under stationary hydrometeorological uncertainty, and under three different load defection scenarios ranging from 0% to 90%. We found that as load defection increases, the utility’s three main businesses (wholesale generation, transmission, and retail distribution) shift in relative importance. As a consequence, the impacts of interannual variability in hydropower production and demand in the utility’s system (a function of streamflow and air temperatures, respectively) become significantly altered. Air temperatures (a proxy for demand) become more predictive of utility financial performance, whereas the utility’s exposure to hydrology is poised to shift in complex ways. Drought will remain a major risk, but extremely wet years (which historically are beneficial to the utility’s significant hydropower holdings) may become damaging due to their association with low market prices. Our results also suggest that load defection could put much more pressure on utilities to make major annual rate adjustments or quickly adapt current strategies for managing weather risk.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4282642
    Collections
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV