• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • Journal of Turbomachinery
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • Journal of Turbomachinery
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Effect of Axial Casing Groove Geometry on Rotor-Groove Interactions in the Tip Region of a Compressor

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    turbo_143_9_091010.pdf (4.774Mb)
    Date
    2021
    Author
    Koley, Subhra Shankha
    Chen, Huang
    Saraswat, Ayush
    Katz, Joseph
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    This experimental study characterizes the interactions of axial casing grooves (ACGs) with the flow in the tip region of an axial turbomachine. The tests involve grooves with the same inlet overlapping with the rotor blade leading edge, but with different exit directions located upstream. Among them, U grooves, whose circumferential outflow opposes the blade motion, achieve a 60% reduction in stall flowrate, but degrade the efficiency around the best efficiency point (BEP) by 2%. The S grooves, whose outlets are parallel to the blade rotation, improve the stall flowrate by only 36%, but do not degrade the BEP performance. To elucidate the mechanisms involved, stereo-PIV measurements covering the tip region and interior of grooves are performed in a refractive index-matched facility. At low flowrates, the inflow into both grooves, which peaks when they are aligned with the blade pressure side (PS), rolls up into a large vortex that lingers within the groove. By design, the outflow from S grooves is circumferentially positive. For the U grooves, fast circumferentially negative outflow peaks at the base of each groove, causing substantial periodic variations in the flow angle near the blade leading edge. At BEP, interactions with both grooves become milder, and most of the tip leakage vortex (TLV) remains in the passage. Interactions with the S grooves are limited; hence, they do not degrade the efficiency. In contrast, the inflow into and outflow from the U grooves reverses direction, causing entrainment of secondary flows, which likely contribute to the reduced BEP efficiency.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4279005
    Collections
    • Journal of Turbomachinery

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV