• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Multiobjective and Joint Operation Model for Multistakeholder Cascade Hydropower System

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    %28ASCE%29WR.1943-5452.0001291.pdf (2.999Mb)
    Date
    11/1/2020
    Author
    Yufei Ma
    Ping-an Zhong
    Bin Xu
    Jianping Bing
    Yanjing Zhang
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Involvement in the operation of a multiobjective and multistakeholder hydropower system requires balancing conflicting objectives and coordinating economic gains to achieve a win–win situation through joint operation. This study developed integrated models of multiobjective joint optimization and synergistic revenue allocation of multistakeholders to resolve conflicts. The multiobjective operation model coupled with the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution method determines a noninferior solution for compromising social (water delivery and flood control), and economic (energy production) objectives with the incorporation of the decision makers’ preference. Thereafter, a novel synergistic revenue allocation method based on the total differential equation (SRA-TD) is proposed. This method is used to systematically decompose the contribution of each stakeholder (reservoir) in the synergistic revenue through cooperation, thereby satisfying the principles of efficiency, rationality, and equity. The integrated models are applied to a hypothetical multistakeholder cascade hydropower system. Results are as follows: (1) The compromise solution selected from the multiobjective optimization operation results increases the firm water supply but reduces the energy production revenue without increasing flood storage compared with the benchmark solution (status quo). (2) The SRA-TD method decomposes the synergistic revenue contribution of each reservoir during each period and verifies its physical generation mechanism, thereby satisfying the basic principles of synergistic revenue allocation. (3) Last, the SRA-TD method comprehensively considers the dynamic effects of inflow conditions, reservoir characteristics, and topological structures of a reservoir system. The proposed method provides a viable alternative for promoting joint optimal operations in a multiobjective and multistakeholder cascade reservoir system.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4267927
    Collections
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV