YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Multiobjective and Joint Operation Model for Multistakeholder Cascade Hydropower System

    Source: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management:;2020:;Volume ( 146 ):;issue: 011
    Author:
    Yufei Ma
    ,
    Ping-an Zhong
    ,
    Bin Xu
    ,
    Jianping Bing
    ,
    Yanjing Zhang
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001291
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: Involvement in the operation of a multiobjective and multistakeholder hydropower system requires balancing conflicting objectives and coordinating economic gains to achieve a win–win situation through joint operation. This study developed integrated models of multiobjective joint optimization and synergistic revenue allocation of multistakeholders to resolve conflicts. The multiobjective operation model coupled with the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution method determines a noninferior solution for compromising social (water delivery and flood control), and economic (energy production) objectives with the incorporation of the decision makers’ preference. Thereafter, a novel synergistic revenue allocation method based on the total differential equation (SRA-TD) is proposed. This method is used to systematically decompose the contribution of each stakeholder (reservoir) in the synergistic revenue through cooperation, thereby satisfying the principles of efficiency, rationality, and equity. The integrated models are applied to a hypothetical multistakeholder cascade hydropower system. Results are as follows: (1) The compromise solution selected from the multiobjective optimization operation results increases the firm water supply but reduces the energy production revenue without increasing flood storage compared with the benchmark solution (status quo). (2) The SRA-TD method decomposes the synergistic revenue contribution of each reservoir during each period and verifies its physical generation mechanism, thereby satisfying the basic principles of synergistic revenue allocation. (3) Last, the SRA-TD method comprehensively considers the dynamic effects of inflow conditions, reservoir characteristics, and topological structures of a reservoir system. The proposed method provides a viable alternative for promoting joint optimal operations in a multiobjective and multistakeholder cascade reservoir system.
    • Download: (2.999Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Multiobjective and Joint Operation Model for Multistakeholder Cascade Hydropower System

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4267927
    Collections
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management

    Show full item record

    contributor authorYufei Ma
    contributor authorPing-an Zhong
    contributor authorBin Xu
    contributor authorJianping Bing
    contributor authorYanjing Zhang
    date accessioned2022-01-30T21:16:52Z
    date available2022-01-30T21:16:52Z
    date issued11/1/2020 12:00:00 AM
    identifier other%28ASCE%29WR.1943-5452.0001291.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4267927
    description abstractInvolvement in the operation of a multiobjective and multistakeholder hydropower system requires balancing conflicting objectives and coordinating economic gains to achieve a win–win situation through joint operation. This study developed integrated models of multiobjective joint optimization and synergistic revenue allocation of multistakeholders to resolve conflicts. The multiobjective operation model coupled with the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution method determines a noninferior solution for compromising social (water delivery and flood control), and economic (energy production) objectives with the incorporation of the decision makers’ preference. Thereafter, a novel synergistic revenue allocation method based on the total differential equation (SRA-TD) is proposed. This method is used to systematically decompose the contribution of each stakeholder (reservoir) in the synergistic revenue through cooperation, thereby satisfying the principles of efficiency, rationality, and equity. The integrated models are applied to a hypothetical multistakeholder cascade hydropower system. Results are as follows: (1) The compromise solution selected from the multiobjective optimization operation results increases the firm water supply but reduces the energy production revenue without increasing flood storage compared with the benchmark solution (status quo). (2) The SRA-TD method decomposes the synergistic revenue contribution of each reservoir during each period and verifies its physical generation mechanism, thereby satisfying the basic principles of synergistic revenue allocation. (3) Last, the SRA-TD method comprehensively considers the dynamic effects of inflow conditions, reservoir characteristics, and topological structures of a reservoir system. The proposed method provides a viable alternative for promoting joint optimal operations in a multiobjective and multistakeholder cascade reservoir system.
    publisherASCE
    titleMultiobjective and Joint Operation Model for Multistakeholder Cascade Hydropower System
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume146
    journal issue11
    journal titleJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001291
    page15
    treeJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management:;2020:;Volume ( 146 ):;issue: 011
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian