• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Engineering Mechanics
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Engineering Mechanics
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Simulation and Peak Value Estimation of Non-Gaussian Wind Pressures Based on Johnson Transformation Model

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    %28ASCE%29EM.1943-7889.0001697.pdf (2.640Mb)
    Date
    2020
    Author
    Fengbo Wu
    Guoqing Huang
    Min Liu
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The simulation and peak value estimation of non-Gaussian wind pressures are important to the structural and cladding design of the building. Due to its straightforwardness and accuracy, the moment-based Hermite polynomial model (HPM) has been widely used. However, its effective region for monotonicity is limited, resulting in its unsuitability for non-Gaussian processes whose skewness and kurtosis are out of the effective region. On the other hand, the Johnson transformation model (JTM) has attracted attention due to its larger effective region compared with that of the HPM. Nevertheless, the systematic study of its application to the simulation and peak value estimation of non-Gaussian wind pressures is less addressed. Specifically, its comparison with the HPM is not well discussed. In this study, a set of closed-form formulas to determine the relationship between correlation coefficients of the non-Gaussian process and those of the underlying Gaussian process was derived, and they facilitate a JTM-based simulation method for the non-Gaussian process. Analytical expressions for the non-Gaussian peak factor were developed. Furthermore, the JTM was systematically compared with the HPM in terms of the translation function, which helps to understand the ensuing performance evaluation on these two models in the simulation and peak value estimation based on the very long wind pressure data. Results showed that the JTM-based peak value estimation method performs well for wind pressures with weak to mild non-Gaussianity, even those beyond the effective region of the HPM, although it may provide slightly worse estimation for strong softening processes compared with the HPM.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4265425
    Collections
    • Journal of Engineering Mechanics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV