• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Performance Evaluation of Asphalt Pavement Resurfacing Treatments Using Structural Equation Modeling

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    JPEODX.0000152.pdf (620.2Kb)
    Date
    2020
    Author
    Qiao Dong
    Xueqin Chen
    Hongren Gong
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The structural equation modeling (SEM) method was used to evaluate the performance of pavement resurfacing treatments. The pavement performance was regarded as a latent variable that cannot be directly observed, pavement condition data such as roughness, rutting, and cracking were regarded as endogenous observed variables, and influencing factors such as traffic and design features were regarded as exogenous observed variables. More than 200 asphalt pavement resurfacing projects applied in Tennessee were investigated for this study. Both the single latent pavement condition (LPC) factor model and the multiple-factor model were built. An exploratory factor analysis was conducted to determine the three latent condition factors LPC1, LPC2, and LPC3 representing ride quality, early age cracking, and excessive distresses, respectively. The results indicated that the multiple-factor model provided better model fitness than the single-factor model. Transverse cracking was the strongest indicator of LPC2, followed by longitudinal wheel path cracking and longitudinal nonwheel path cracking. The influence of rutting on LPC3 was the greatest, followed by fatigue cracking, block cracking, and longitudinal joint cracking. The analysis results also showed that highway class (interstates or state routes) was significant for the three LPCs. The factor loadings of age, mill, thickness, and traffic level on LPC3 were greater than the factor loadings on LPC1 and LPC2. The SEM method was proved to be able to quantify the effects of the five influencing variables on each pavement distress indicator.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4264848
    Collections
    • Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV