YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Performance Evaluation of Asphalt Pavement Resurfacing Treatments Using Structural Equation Modeling

    Source: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements:;2020:;Volume ( 146 ):;issue: 001
    Author:
    Qiao Dong
    ,
    Xueqin Chen
    ,
    Hongren Gong
    DOI: 10.1061/JPEODX.0000152
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: The structural equation modeling (SEM) method was used to evaluate the performance of pavement resurfacing treatments. The pavement performance was regarded as a latent variable that cannot be directly observed, pavement condition data such as roughness, rutting, and cracking were regarded as endogenous observed variables, and influencing factors such as traffic and design features were regarded as exogenous observed variables. More than 200 asphalt pavement resurfacing projects applied in Tennessee were investigated for this study. Both the single latent pavement condition (LPC) factor model and the multiple-factor model were built. An exploratory factor analysis was conducted to determine the three latent condition factors LPC1, LPC2, and LPC3 representing ride quality, early age cracking, and excessive distresses, respectively. The results indicated that the multiple-factor model provided better model fitness than the single-factor model. Transverse cracking was the strongest indicator of LPC2, followed by longitudinal wheel path cracking and longitudinal nonwheel path cracking. The influence of rutting on LPC3 was the greatest, followed by fatigue cracking, block cracking, and longitudinal joint cracking. The analysis results also showed that highway class (interstates or state routes) was significant for the three LPCs. The factor loadings of age, mill, thickness, and traffic level on LPC3 were greater than the factor loadings on LPC1 and LPC2. The SEM method was proved to be able to quantify the effects of the five influencing variables on each pavement distress indicator.
    • Download: (620.2Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Performance Evaluation of Asphalt Pavement Resurfacing Treatments Using Structural Equation Modeling

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4264848
    Collections
    • Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements

    Show full item record

    contributor authorQiao Dong
    contributor authorXueqin Chen
    contributor authorHongren Gong
    date accessioned2022-01-30T19:12:16Z
    date available2022-01-30T19:12:16Z
    date issued2020
    identifier otherJPEODX.0000152.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4264848
    description abstractThe structural equation modeling (SEM) method was used to evaluate the performance of pavement resurfacing treatments. The pavement performance was regarded as a latent variable that cannot be directly observed, pavement condition data such as roughness, rutting, and cracking were regarded as endogenous observed variables, and influencing factors such as traffic and design features were regarded as exogenous observed variables. More than 200 asphalt pavement resurfacing projects applied in Tennessee were investigated for this study. Both the single latent pavement condition (LPC) factor model and the multiple-factor model were built. An exploratory factor analysis was conducted to determine the three latent condition factors LPC1, LPC2, and LPC3 representing ride quality, early age cracking, and excessive distresses, respectively. The results indicated that the multiple-factor model provided better model fitness than the single-factor model. Transverse cracking was the strongest indicator of LPC2, followed by longitudinal wheel path cracking and longitudinal nonwheel path cracking. The influence of rutting on LPC3 was the greatest, followed by fatigue cracking, block cracking, and longitudinal joint cracking. The analysis results also showed that highway class (interstates or state routes) was significant for the three LPCs. The factor loadings of age, mill, thickness, and traffic level on LPC3 were greater than the factor loadings on LPC1 and LPC2. The SEM method was proved to be able to quantify the effects of the five influencing variables on each pavement distress indicator.
    publisherASCE
    titlePerformance Evaluation of Asphalt Pavement Resurfacing Treatments Using Structural Equation Modeling
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume146
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements
    identifier doi10.1061/JPEODX.0000152
    page04019043
    treeJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements:;2020:;Volume ( 146 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian