Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVrban Sandra;Wang Yi;McBean Edward A.;Binns Andrew;Gharabaghi Bahram
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-26T07:50:11Z
dc.date.available2019-02-26T07:50:11Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.other%28ASCE%29HE.1943-5584.0001712.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4249733
dc.description.abstractThis study assesses the advantages and limitations of developing design storms using the partial duration series exceedance-based (PDS-E) rainfall frequency model in comparison with the annual maximum series (AMS) model. Rainfall records were obtained from 21 rainfall gauges in Ontario. A procedure to develop the PDS-E was derived, addressing sensitivities to missing values, selection of thresholds, and quantile and confidence limit estimates. The reference values of 1-h duration and 2- and 5-year return period design rainfall intensities were 1% and 3% greater in PDS-E than in AMS data, on average, indicating the merits of using PDS-E data for exceedance-based modeling of frequent events. The PDS-E estimates of 1-h duration and 5-year return period events were 3.5% greater than AMS estimates. The use of the PDS-E method over the AMS method for developing design storms for stormwater infrastructure is recommended.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleEvaluation of Stormwater Infrastructure Design Storms Developed Using Partial Duration and Annual Maximum Series Models
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume23
dc.journal.issue12
dc.journal.titleJournal of Hydrologic Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001712
dc.page4018051
dc.treeJournal of Hydrologic Engineering:;2018:;Volume ( 023 ):;issue: 012
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record