Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBrahim Benmokrane
dc.contributor.authorAllan Manalo
dc.contributor.authorJean-Charles Bouhet
dc.contributor.authorKhaled Mohamed
dc.contributor.authorMathieu Robert
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-30T13:04:55Z
dc.date.available2017-12-30T13:04:55Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.other%28ASCE%29CC.1943-5614.0000814.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4245422
dc.description.abstractCurrent standards do not consider the diameter of glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars used as internal reinforcement in concrete structures to be a factor influencing bar durability. This paper investigates the effects of bar diameter on the physical and mechanical properties as well as the durability of GFRP reinforcing bars conditioned for three months at 60°C in an alkaline solution simulating a concrete environment. Five diameters (nominal diameters of 9.5, 12.7, 15.9, 19.1, and 25.4 mm) were considered; bar properties were assessed before and after conditioning. Microstructural analyses and measurement of physicochemical properties were also carried out. The results show that bar size had no significant effect on bar physical properties, except for water absorption. The smaller diameter bars had higher water absorption than the larger ones because of their higher surface area-to-volume ratios. In the case of the unconditioned bars, the tensile strength and modulus were not significantly affected by bar diameter, but there was a size effect for interlaminar shear strength and flexural strength. Conversely, the conditioning in the alkaline solution had a greater negative effect on the tensile strength of the larger bars than on the smaller ones. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) observations and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) analysis revealed that the degradation remained at the surface of all the conditioned specimens. Nevertheless, there were only small variations between the physical and mechanical properties of the GFRP bars of different diameters. This indicates that the current provisions in standards that do not relate strength retention limit to bar size are acceptable.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleEffects of Diameter on the Durability of Glass Fiber–Reinforced Polymer Bars Conditioned in Alkaline Solution
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume21
dc.journal.issue5
dc.journal.titleJournal of Composites for Construction
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000814
dc.page04017040
dc.treeJournal of Composites for Construction:;2017:;Volume ( 021 ):;issue: 005
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record