Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAntonio Bilotta
dc.contributor.authorFrancesca Ceroni
dc.contributor.authorJoaquim A. O. Barros
dc.contributor.authorInês Costa
dc.contributor.authorAniello Palmieri
dc.contributor.authorZsombor K. Szabó
dc.contributor.authorEmidio Nigro
dc.contributor.authorStijn Matthys
dc.contributor.authorGyörgy L. Balazs
dc.contributor.authorMarisa Pecce
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-30T13:04:12Z
dc.date.available2017-12-30T13:04:12Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.other%28ASCE%29CC.1943-5614.0000579.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://138.201.223.254:8080/yetl1/handle/yetl/4245296
dc.description.abstractDespite the extensive research on the debonding behavior of fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) strengthening systems, no standard methodology has been established on its experimental characterization. To assess the performance and reliability of small-scale testing on near-surface mounted (NSM) FRP strengthening systems, an experimental program was carried out on a series of nine NSM FRP strengthening systems (bars and strips), in the framework of an international round robin testing (RRT). Eleven laboratories and seven manufacturers and suppliers participated in this extensive international exercise, which regarded both NSM and EBR FRP strengthening systems. The experimental results are discussed and compared in this paper in order to investigate (1) the bond behavior of NSM strips and bars, (2) the influence of alternative single-bond or double-bond shear pulling setups adopted by the participating laboratories, and (3) the influence in concrete strength due to different constituent materials between countries in applying a prescribed mix. The results show no significant influence of the concrete strength on both failure modes and loads. On the other hand, axial stiffness and surface treatment of the FRP NSM systems strongly affect both the bond strength and the parameters identifying the bond laws. Differences of bond strength experimentally recorded for the same FRP NSM systems tested according to different setups range between 10 and 25%. Therefore, for standard bond test protocol, the single shear bond test setup is more reliable, due to its higher feasibility compared with the double shear test setup.
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
dc.titleBond of NSM FRP-Strengthened Concrete: Round Robin Test Initiative
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume20
dc.journal.issue1
dc.journal.titleJournal of Composites for Construction
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000579
dc.page04015026
dc.treeJournal of Composites for Construction:;2016:;Volume ( 020 ):;issue: 001
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record