Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJ. T. Taylor
dc.contributor.authorP. E. Lewis
dc.contributor.authorJ. W. Ramsey
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-09T01:38:10Z
dc.date.available2017-05-09T01:38:10Z
dc.date.copyrightOctober, 1974
dc.date.issued1974
dc.identifier.issn0094-4289
dc.identifier.otherJEMTA8-26838#283_1.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/164792
dc.description.abstractThis paper describes the application of material test, stress-fatigue-fracture mechanics analyses, nondestructive examinations and repairs to verify the structural integrity and the remaining cyclic life in a large pressurized wind tunnel (65,000 ft3 ) (1840 m3 ). The tunnel with pressures up to 135 psig (0.93 MPa) was constructed in 1940 and has been in service to the present date. The only record of a non-destructive examination conducted on the vessel prior to this evaluation was a hydrostatic test-pressure at 1 1/2 times the maximum working pressure. The material tests were performed on a sample of material (A-70 steel) cut from the tunnel shell. These tests included fracture toughness (R-curve, Kc) as determined from a compact tension specimen, crack growth rate (da/dn vs ΔK), Charpy V-notch, dynamic tear (from which the nil-ductility temperature was determined), and tensile and chemical tests. The results and applications are presented and discussed. Stress analyses include computer programs based on finite element and numerical integration techniques. Fatigue analyses incorporating a fatigue reduction or stress amplification factor to account for a small flaw existing in a weld are presented. Fracture mechanics analyses of the tunnel shell were performed for (1) the general membrane regions, (2) regions of high bending stress, and (3) areas at tunnel penetrations. The critical flaw sizes at each location are determined. The use of the “leak before break” criterion is discussed. The non-destructive examinations (radiograph, ultrasonic, sonic, and magnetic particle) to verify the assumptions of fatigue-fracture mechanics analyses and ASME Code applications are documented. Penetrations in the tunnel shell that were fatigue limited are shown “before” and “after” repair. The remaining cyclic life as obtained by the fatigue-fracture mechanics analyses and the operating envelope which resulted from these studies for metal temperature vs pressure was determined to be approximately 10 years.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleA Procedure for Verifying the Structural Integrity of an Existing Pressurized Wind Tunnel
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume96
dc.journal.issue4
dc.journal.titleJournal of Engineering Materials and Technology
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.3443243
dc.journal.fristpage283
dc.journal.lastpage291
dc.identifier.eissn1528-8889
dc.keywordsWind tunnels
dc.keywordsTunnels
dc.keywordsFatigue
dc.keywordsFracture (Process)
dc.keywordsPressure
dc.keywordsShells
dc.keywordsTemperature
dc.keywordsMaintenance
dc.keywordsStress
dc.keywordsDuctility
dc.keywordsStress analysis (Engineering)
dc.keywordsBending (Stress)
dc.keywordsFinite element analysis
dc.keywordsMetals
dc.keywordsSteel
dc.keywordsTension
dc.keywordsHydrostatics
dc.keywordsFracture mechanics
dc.keywordsComputer software
dc.keywordsFatigue analysis
dc.keywordsFracture toughness
dc.keywordsMagnetic particles
dc.keywordsMembranes
dc.keywordsVessels
dc.keywordsLeak-before-break AND ASME Standards
dc.treeJournal of Engineering Materials and Technology:;1974:;volume( 096 ):;issue: 004
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record