• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    A Procedure for Verifying the Structural Integrity of an Existing Pressurized Wind Tunnel

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    JEMTA8-26838#283_1.pdf (1.140Mb)
    Date
    1974
    Author
    J. T. Taylor
    P. E. Lewis
    J. W. Ramsey
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    This paper describes the application of material test, stress-fatigue-fracture mechanics analyses, nondestructive examinations and repairs to verify the structural integrity and the remaining cyclic life in a large pressurized wind tunnel (65,000 ft3 ) (1840 m3 ). The tunnel with pressures up to 135 psig (0.93 MPa) was constructed in 1940 and has been in service to the present date. The only record of a non-destructive examination conducted on the vessel prior to this evaluation was a hydrostatic test-pressure at 1 1/2 times the maximum working pressure. The material tests were performed on a sample of material (A-70 steel) cut from the tunnel shell. These tests included fracture toughness (R-curve, Kc) as determined from a compact tension specimen, crack growth rate (da/dn vs ΔK), Charpy V-notch, dynamic tear (from which the nil-ductility temperature was determined), and tensile and chemical tests. The results and applications are presented and discussed. Stress analyses include computer programs based on finite element and numerical integration techniques. Fatigue analyses incorporating a fatigue reduction or stress amplification factor to account for a small flaw existing in a weld are presented. Fracture mechanics analyses of the tunnel shell were performed for (1) the general membrane regions, (2) regions of high bending stress, and (3) areas at tunnel penetrations. The critical flaw sizes at each location are determined. The use of the “leak before break” criterion is discussed. The non-destructive examinations (radiograph, ultrasonic, sonic, and magnetic particle) to verify the assumptions of fatigue-fracture mechanics analyses and ASME Code applications are documented. Penetrations in the tunnel shell that were fatigue limited are shown “before” and “after” repair. The remaining cyclic life as obtained by the fatigue-fracture mechanics analyses and the operating envelope which resulted from these studies for metal temperature vs pressure was determined to be approximately 10 years.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/164792
    Collections
    • Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV