Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFreeman, Jacob A.
dc.contributor.authorRoy, Christopher J.
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-09T01:34:29Z
dc.date.available2017-05-09T01:34:29Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn1048-9002
dc.identifier.otherjcise_016_03_031003.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/162846
dc.description.abstractUsing a global optimization evolutionary algorithm (EA), propagating aleatory and epistemic uncertainty within the optimization loop, and using computational fluid dynamics (CFD), this study determines a design for a 3D tractortrailer base (backend) drag reduction device that reduces the windaveraged drag coefficient by 41% at 57 mph (92 km/h). Because it is optimized under uncertainty, this design is relatively insensitive to uncertain wind speed and direction and uncertain deflection angles due to mounting accuracy and static aeroelastic loading. The model includes five design variables with generous constraints, and this study additionally includes the uncertain effects on drag prediction due to truck speed and elevation, steady Reynoldsaveraged Navier–Stokes (RANS) approximation, and numerical approximation. This study uses the Design Analysis Kit for Optimization and Terascale Applications (DAKOTA) optimization and uncertainty quantification (UQ) framework to interface the RANS flow solver, grid generator, and optimization algorithm. The computational model is a simplified fullscale tractortrailer with flow at highway speed. For the optimized design, the estimate of total predictive uncertainty is +15/−42%; 8–10% of this uncertainty comes from model form (computation versus experiment); 3–7% from model input (wind speed and direction, flap angle, and truck speed); and +0.0/−28.5% from numerical approximation (due to the relatively coarse, 6 أ— 106 cell grid). Relative comparison of designs to the noflaps baseline should have considerably less uncertainty because numerical error and input variation are nearly eliminated and model form differences are reduced. The total predictive uncertainty is also presented in the form of a probability box, which may be used to decide how to improve the model and reduce uncertainty.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleGlobal Optimization Under Uncertainty and Uncertainty Quantification Applied to Tractor Trailer Base Flaps
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume1
dc.journal.issue2
dc.journal.titleJournal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4033289
dc.journal.fristpage21008
dc.journal.lastpage21008
dc.identifier.eissn1528-8927
dc.treeJournal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification:;2016:;volume( 001 ):;issue: 002
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record