• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Global Optimization Under Uncertainty and Uncertainty Quantification Applied to Tractor Trailer Base Flaps

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    jcise_016_03_031003.pdf (2.315Mb)
    Date
    2016
    Author
    Freeman, Jacob A.
    Roy, Christopher J.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Using a global optimization evolutionary algorithm (EA), propagating aleatory and epistemic uncertainty within the optimization loop, and using computational fluid dynamics (CFD), this study determines a design for a 3D tractortrailer base (backend) drag reduction device that reduces the windaveraged drag coefficient by 41% at 57 mph (92 km/h). Because it is optimized under uncertainty, this design is relatively insensitive to uncertain wind speed and direction and uncertain deflection angles due to mounting accuracy and static aeroelastic loading. The model includes five design variables with generous constraints, and this study additionally includes the uncertain effects on drag prediction due to truck speed and elevation, steady Reynoldsaveraged Navier–Stokes (RANS) approximation, and numerical approximation. This study uses the Design Analysis Kit for Optimization and Terascale Applications (DAKOTA) optimization and uncertainty quantification (UQ) framework to interface the RANS flow solver, grid generator, and optimization algorithm. The computational model is a simplified fullscale tractortrailer with flow at highway speed. For the optimized design, the estimate of total predictive uncertainty is +15/−42%; 8–10% of this uncertainty comes from model form (computation versus experiment); 3–7% from model input (wind speed and direction, flap angle, and truck speed); and +0.0/−28.5% from numerical approximation (due to the relatively coarse, 6 أ— 106 cell grid). Relative comparison of designs to the noflaps baseline should have considerably less uncertainty because numerical error and input variation are nearly eliminated and model form differences are reduced. The total predictive uncertainty is also presented in the form of a probability box, which may be used to decide how to improve the model and reduce uncertainty.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/162846
    Collections
    • Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV