Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBeck, Joseph
dc.contributor.authorWalczyk, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorBuelte, Steve
dc.contributor.authorHoffman, Casey
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-09T00:59:27Z
dc.date.available2017-05-09T00:59:27Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.issn2381-6872
dc.identifier.otherfc_10_4_041004.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/152003
dc.description.abstractUltrasonic bonding of lowtemperature PEM membrane electrode assembly (MEA) components together has been shown previously to cut both cycle time and energy input of that manufacturing step by over an order of magnitude as compared to the industry standard of thermal pressing. This paper compares performance between ultrasonically and thermally bonded lowtemperature MEAs and characterizes the performance losses from the new bonding process. A randomized, full factorial experiment was designed and conducted to examine performance of MEAs with 10 cm2 active area while varying three factors: bonding method (ultrasonically and thermally pressed using previously optimized bonding parameters), membrane condition (dry and conditioned Nafionآ® 115), and electrode catalyst loading (0.16 and 0.33 mg Pt/cm2). Ultrasonic MEAs performed as well as their thermal MEAs across all tested current densities with pure oxygen supplied to the cathode. However, thermal MEAs outperformed ultrasonic MEAs at current densities above 0.4 A/cm2 with air supplied to the cathode. Impedance spectroscopy, cyclic voltammetry, and flow sensitivity analyses were used to characterize the performance losses of the ultrasonic MEAs. The data suggest the presence of oxygen diffusion losses above 0.4 A/cm2 when air was supplied to the cathode. Ultrasonic MEAs were three times more sensitive to changes in air flow rate on the cathode than the thermally MEAs. Increasing the platinum catalyst loading from 0.16 to 0.33 mg Pt/cm2 resulted in a performance enhancement of approximately 20 mV and 65% greater electrochemical surface area. Understanding the effect of ultrasonic bonding on various performance losses will help optimize the MEA bonding process. Analysis of specific losses present for ultrasonic MEAs may also provide insight into the design of MEA components for ultrasonic bonding.
dc.publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
dc.titleComparison of Performance Losses Between Ultrasonic and Thermal Bonding of Membrane Electrode Assemblies in Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells
dc.typeJournal Paper
dc.journal.volume10
dc.journal.issue4
dc.journal.titleJournal of Fuel Cell Science and Technology
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/1.4024567
dc.journal.fristpage41004
dc.journal.lastpage41004
dc.identifier.eissn2381-6910
dc.treeJournal of Fuel Cell Science and Technology:;2013:;volume( 010 ):;issue: 004
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record