• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • Journal of Fuel Cell Science and Technology
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • Journal of Fuel Cell Science and Technology
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Comparison of Performance Losses Between Ultrasonic and Thermal Bonding of Membrane Electrode Assemblies in Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    fc_10_4_041004.pdf (1.209Mb)
    Date
    2013
    Author
    Beck, Joseph
    Walczyk, Daniel
    Buelte, Steve
    Hoffman, Casey
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Ultrasonic bonding of lowtemperature PEM membrane electrode assembly (MEA) components together has been shown previously to cut both cycle time and energy input of that manufacturing step by over an order of magnitude as compared to the industry standard of thermal pressing. This paper compares performance between ultrasonically and thermally bonded lowtemperature MEAs and characterizes the performance losses from the new bonding process. A randomized, full factorial experiment was designed and conducted to examine performance of MEAs with 10 cm2 active area while varying three factors: bonding method (ultrasonically and thermally pressed using previously optimized bonding parameters), membrane condition (dry and conditioned Nafionآ® 115), and electrode catalyst loading (0.16 and 0.33 mg Pt/cm2). Ultrasonic MEAs performed as well as their thermal MEAs across all tested current densities with pure oxygen supplied to the cathode. However, thermal MEAs outperformed ultrasonic MEAs at current densities above 0.4 A/cm2 with air supplied to the cathode. Impedance spectroscopy, cyclic voltammetry, and flow sensitivity analyses were used to characterize the performance losses of the ultrasonic MEAs. The data suggest the presence of oxygen diffusion losses above 0.4 A/cm2 when air was supplied to the cathode. Ultrasonic MEAs were three times more sensitive to changes in air flow rate on the cathode than the thermally MEAs. Increasing the platinum catalyst loading from 0.16 to 0.33 mg Pt/cm2 resulted in a performance enhancement of approximately 20 mV and 65% greater electrochemical surface area. Understanding the effect of ultrasonic bonding on various performance losses will help optimize the MEA bonding process. Analysis of specific losses present for ultrasonic MEAs may also provide insight into the design of MEA components for ultrasonic bonding.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/152003
    Collections
    • Journal of Fuel Cell Science and Technology

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV