Show simple item record

contributor authorA. Murthy
contributor authorJ. G. Lenard
date accessioned2017-05-08T23:13:30Z
date available2017-05-08T23:13:30Z
date copyrightJanuary, 1982
date issued1982
identifier issn0094-4289
identifier otherJEMTA8-26885#47_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/95913
description abstractThe accuracy and precision of four mathematial models of varying complexity are evaluated by comparing their predictions to experimental data generated in carefully controlled laboratory experiments and to production logs obtained from the finishing trains of several Canadian, American, and European hot strip mills. The materials rolled are low carbon and HSLA steels; the models used are Orowan’s formulation with Shida’s flow strength and Ford and Alexander’s formulation with Shida’s flow strength; then both these formulations are combined with Ekelund’s flow strength equation. It is concluded that Orowan’s formulation with Shida’s flow strength relation is the most consistently accurate technique of analysis. Further, the behavior of HSLA steels is not well described by either Shida’s or Ekelund’s equations.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleStatistical Evaluation of Some Hot Rolling Theories
typeJournal Paper
journal volume104
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Engineering Materials and Technology
identifier doi10.1115/1.3225035
journal fristpage47
journal lastpage52
identifier eissn1528-8889
keywordsFlow (Dynamics)
keywordsSteel
keywordsFinishing
keywordsAccuracy and precision
keywordsCarbon
keywordsEquations
keywordsHot rolling
keywordsStrips AND Trains
treeJournal of Engineering Materials and Technology:;1982:;volume( 104 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record