Show simple item record

contributor authorG. E. Johnson
contributor authorM. A. Townsend
date accessioned2017-05-08T23:07:16Z
date available2017-05-08T23:07:16Z
date copyrightOctober, 1979
date issued1979
identifier issn1050-0472
identifier otherJMDEDB-27975#663_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/92457
description abstractMany nonlinear programming algorithms employ a univariate subprocedure to determine the step length at each multivariate iteration. In this note, a popular polynomial approximation-interpolation univariate algorithm (DSC-P) is compared to two versions of the golden section search. One-dimensional test functions which model the behavior of barrier and penalty functions are used for the comparison. In general, the polynominal method indicates convergence in fewer function evaluations than the golden section search. However, it is significantly less reliable. Tight convergence criteria do not necessarily lead to accurate results with the polynomial-based univariate strategy. A companion paper provides a theoretical basis for the observations and gives conditions underwhich DSC-P will fail—even for strictly convex, unimodal functions and exact arithmetic.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleNumerical Investigation of Some Potential Problems of Univariate Minimization Methods
typeJournal Paper
journal volume101
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Mechanical Design
identifier doi10.1115/1.3454118
journal fristpage663
journal lastpage666
identifier eissn1528-9001
keywordsAlgorithms
keywordsApproximation
keywordsFunctions
keywordsInterpolation
keywordsNonlinear programming AND Polynomials
treeJournal of Mechanical Design:;1979:;volume( 101 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record