Triaxial Test Simulations with Discrete Element Method and Hydrostatic BoundariesSource: Journal of Engineering Mechanics:;2004:;Volume ( 130 ):;issue: 010Author:Tang-Tat Ng
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2004)130:10(1188)Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Abstract: A new boundary condition has been developed for the discrete element method. This boundary is different from the conventional periodic, rigid, or flexible boundries. This new boundary mechanism was developed to simulate triaxial tests. The new boundary, hydrostatic boundary, simulated the chamber fluid but not the rubber membrane. When a particle (ellipsoids in our simulations) contacts the hydrostatic boundary, pressure is developed. The interaction between the particle and the boundary is calculated analytically based on geometry. This hydrostatic boundary condition was implemented into an existing ellipsoidal discrete element code. Triaxial compression drained tests were performed with both periodic and hydrostatic boundaries. The result showed an increase in friction angle over the values observed from the periodic boundary mechanism. The result also closely resembles the experimental triaxial data. Thirteen specimens were generated and were used to investigate the following variables: particle shape, specimen size, and void ratio. A unique slope of the linear relationship between friction angle and void ratio was identified for monosize specimens of different particle shapes. It is found that the friction angle decreases as the aspect ratio increases provided that the void ratio of the two specimens is the same. The friction angle is linear proportional to the coordination number for monosize specimens regardless the specimen size. Also, the specimen size does not influence the behavior of two-size specimens.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Tang-Tat Ng | |
date accessioned | 2017-05-08T22:40:14Z | |
date available | 2017-05-08T22:40:14Z | |
date copyright | October 2004 | |
date issued | 2004 | |
identifier other | %28asce%290733-9399%282004%29130%3A10%281188%29.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/85825 | |
description abstract | A new boundary condition has been developed for the discrete element method. This boundary is different from the conventional periodic, rigid, or flexible boundries. This new boundary mechanism was developed to simulate triaxial tests. The new boundary, hydrostatic boundary, simulated the chamber fluid but not the rubber membrane. When a particle (ellipsoids in our simulations) contacts the hydrostatic boundary, pressure is developed. The interaction between the particle and the boundary is calculated analytically based on geometry. This hydrostatic boundary condition was implemented into an existing ellipsoidal discrete element code. Triaxial compression drained tests were performed with both periodic and hydrostatic boundaries. The result showed an increase in friction angle over the values observed from the periodic boundary mechanism. The result also closely resembles the experimental triaxial data. Thirteen specimens were generated and were used to investigate the following variables: particle shape, specimen size, and void ratio. A unique slope of the linear relationship between friction angle and void ratio was identified for monosize specimens of different particle shapes. It is found that the friction angle decreases as the aspect ratio increases provided that the void ratio of the two specimens is the same. The friction angle is linear proportional to the coordination number for monosize specimens regardless the specimen size. Also, the specimen size does not influence the behavior of two-size specimens. | |
publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
title | Triaxial Test Simulations with Discrete Element Method and Hydrostatic Boundaries | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 130 | |
journal issue | 10 | |
journal title | Journal of Engineering Mechanics | |
identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2004)130:10(1188) | |
tree | Journal of Engineering Mechanics:;2004:;Volume ( 130 ):;issue: 010 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |