YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Value-Added Assessment of Construction Plans

    Source: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management:;1999:;Volume ( 125 ):;issue: 004
    Author:
    Laurie J. Pregenzer
    ,
    Paul J. Seppanen
    ,
    John C. Kunz
    ,
    Boyd C. Paulson
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1999)125:4(242)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: In the purchase of a constructed facility, the buyer values those components that are in place when the user occupies the building. A task of placing or assembling such a component is therefore “value-adding” (VA). This paper presents a method to classify construction tasks as VA, contributory, or ineffective to assess the value-added by individual activities, as well as the aggregate value-added effectiveness of the construction plan. Current approaches to evaluate construction operations are based on limited examples rather than general rules. The proposed method presents a list of nine rules that are applicable to various construction trades. This paper provides for the value-added classification rules, specifies how to decompose activities for value-added analysis, and presents an illustrative test case. The proposed method can be used to assess the overall planned effectiveness of a detailed construction plan or the actual effectiveness of a construction operation. A case study of masonry wall construction indicates that the method requires significant understanding of the evaluated operation and task precedence relationships to classify activities properly. The use of this method for construction plan assessment enables a contractor to identify and potentially eliminate or reduce non-VA tasks, as well as predict the value-added effectiveness of a plan.
    • Download: (171.2Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Value-Added Assessment of Construction Plans

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/85789
    Collections
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management

    Show full item record

    contributor authorLaurie J. Pregenzer
    contributor authorPaul J. Seppanen
    contributor authorJohn C. Kunz
    contributor authorBoyd C. Paulson
    date accessioned2017-05-08T22:40:11Z
    date available2017-05-08T22:40:11Z
    date copyrightAugust 1999
    date issued1999
    identifier other%28asce%290733-9364%281999%29125%3A4%28242%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/85789
    description abstractIn the purchase of a constructed facility, the buyer values those components that are in place when the user occupies the building. A task of placing or assembling such a component is therefore “value-adding” (VA). This paper presents a method to classify construction tasks as VA, contributory, or ineffective to assess the value-added by individual activities, as well as the aggregate value-added effectiveness of the construction plan. Current approaches to evaluate construction operations are based on limited examples rather than general rules. The proposed method presents a list of nine rules that are applicable to various construction trades. This paper provides for the value-added classification rules, specifies how to decompose activities for value-added analysis, and presents an illustrative test case. The proposed method can be used to assess the overall planned effectiveness of a detailed construction plan or the actual effectiveness of a construction operation. A case study of masonry wall construction indicates that the method requires significant understanding of the evaluated operation and task precedence relationships to classify activities properly. The use of this method for construction plan assessment enables a contractor to identify and potentially eliminate or reduce non-VA tasks, as well as predict the value-added effectiveness of a plan.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleValue-Added Assessment of Construction Plans
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume125
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1999)125:4(242)
    treeJournal of Construction Engineering and Management:;1999:;Volume ( 125 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian