YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Engineering Mechanics
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Engineering Mechanics
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Potential for Structural Failure in the Seismic Near Field

    Source: Journal of Engineering Mechanics:;2003:;Volume ( 129 ):;issue: 008
    Author:
    Matthew W. Roberts
    ,
    Loren D. Lutes
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2003)129:8(927)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: This study analyzes the possibility that large distortions and distortion rates due to wave-propagation phenomena within structures were responsible for unexpected cracking at connections of steel-frame buildings in the seismic near-field region during the Northridge (1994) and Kobe (1995) earthquakes. Since such internal wave propagation is characteristic of a structure with a continuous distribution of mass, the problem is studied by numerically simulating the structural response for both discrete and continuous models of a 20-story building, using ground motion time histories from the Northridge earthquake. The time histories are chosen from the far-field and near-field regions of the earthquake to determine if wave-propagation effects within the structure are especially significant in the near field. A truncated modal analysis is also performed using only the first vibrational mode to see if significantly lower response levels result. It is found that the continuous model gives higher response levels—indicating that wave propagation may have been a factor—but the discrepancy is not limited to the near field. Strain rates are higher from the continuous model than from the discrete model and much higher than from the truncated modal analysis, but the magnitudes are too low to be a significant factor in the observed damage. The explanation for the connection cracking may simply be high-intensity ground motion in the near field.
    • Download: (115.9Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Potential for Structural Failure in the Seismic Near Field

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/85785
    Collections
    • Journal of Engineering Mechanics

    Show full item record

    contributor authorMatthew W. Roberts
    contributor authorLoren D. Lutes
    date accessioned2017-05-08T22:40:10Z
    date available2017-05-08T22:40:10Z
    date copyrightAugust 2003
    date issued2003
    identifier other%28asce%290733-9399%282003%29129%3A8%28927%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/85785
    description abstractThis study analyzes the possibility that large distortions and distortion rates due to wave-propagation phenomena within structures were responsible for unexpected cracking at connections of steel-frame buildings in the seismic near-field region during the Northridge (1994) and Kobe (1995) earthquakes. Since such internal wave propagation is characteristic of a structure with a continuous distribution of mass, the problem is studied by numerically simulating the structural response for both discrete and continuous models of a 20-story building, using ground motion time histories from the Northridge earthquake. The time histories are chosen from the far-field and near-field regions of the earthquake to determine if wave-propagation effects within the structure are especially significant in the near field. A truncated modal analysis is also performed using only the first vibrational mode to see if significantly lower response levels result. It is found that the continuous model gives higher response levels—indicating that wave propagation may have been a factor—but the discrepancy is not limited to the near field. Strain rates are higher from the continuous model than from the discrete model and much higher than from the truncated modal analysis, but the magnitudes are too low to be a significant factor in the observed damage. The explanation for the connection cracking may simply be high-intensity ground motion in the near field.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titlePotential for Structural Failure in the Seismic Near Field
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume129
    journal issue8
    journal titleJournal of Engineering Mechanics
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2003)129:8(927)
    treeJournal of Engineering Mechanics:;2003:;Volume ( 129 ):;issue: 008
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian