YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Engineering Mechanics
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Engineering Mechanics
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Large-Strain Generalization of Microplane Model for Concrete and Application

    Source: Journal of Engineering Mechanics:;2000:;Volume ( 126 ):;issue: 009
    Author:
    Zdeněk P. Bažant
    ,
    Mark D. Adley
    ,
    Ignacio Carol
    ,
    Milan Jirásek
    ,
    Stephen A. Akers
    ,
    Bob Rohani
    ,
    J. Donald Cargile
    ,
    Ferhun C. Caner
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:9(971)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: The formulation of the microplane model for concrete and development of model M4 in the three preceding companion papers in this study is here extended to large strains. After giving examples of certain difficulties with the second Piola-Kirchhoff stress tensor in the modeling of strength and frictional limits on weak planes within the material, the back-rotated Cauchy (true) tensor is introduced as the stress measure. The strain tensor conjugate to the back-rotated Cauchy (or Kirchhoff) stress tensor is unsuitable because it is nonholonomic (i.e., path-dependent) and because its microplane components do not characterize meaningful deformation measures. Therefore Green's Lagrangian tensor is adopted, even though it is not conjugate. Only for this strain measure do the microplane components of the strain tensor suffice to characterize the normal stretch and shear angle on that microplane. Using such nonconjugate strain and stress tensors is admissible because, for concrete, the elastic parts of strains as well as the total volumetric strains are always small, and because the algorithm used guarantees the energy dissipation by large inelastic strains to be nonnegative. Examples of dynamic structural analysis are given.
    • Download: (333.2Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Large-Strain Generalization of Microplane Model for Concrete and Application

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/85262
    Collections
    • Journal of Engineering Mechanics

    Show full item record

    contributor authorZdeněk P. Bažant
    contributor authorMark D. Adley
    contributor authorIgnacio Carol
    contributor authorMilan Jirásek
    contributor authorStephen A. Akers
    contributor authorBob Rohani
    contributor authorJ. Donald Cargile
    contributor authorFerhun C. Caner
    date accessioned2017-05-08T22:39:22Z
    date available2017-05-08T22:39:22Z
    date copyrightSeptember 2000
    date issued2000
    identifier other%28asce%290733-9399%282000%29126%3A9%28971%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/85262
    description abstractThe formulation of the microplane model for concrete and development of model M4 in the three preceding companion papers in this study is here extended to large strains. After giving examples of certain difficulties with the second Piola-Kirchhoff stress tensor in the modeling of strength and frictional limits on weak planes within the material, the back-rotated Cauchy (true) tensor is introduced as the stress measure. The strain tensor conjugate to the back-rotated Cauchy (or Kirchhoff) stress tensor is unsuitable because it is nonholonomic (i.e., path-dependent) and because its microplane components do not characterize meaningful deformation measures. Therefore Green's Lagrangian tensor is adopted, even though it is not conjugate. Only for this strain measure do the microplane components of the strain tensor suffice to characterize the normal stretch and shear angle on that microplane. Using such nonconjugate strain and stress tensors is admissible because, for concrete, the elastic parts of strains as well as the total volumetric strains are always small, and because the algorithm used guarantees the energy dissipation by large inelastic strains to be nonnegative. Examples of dynamic structural analysis are given.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleLarge-Strain Generalization of Microplane Model for Concrete and Application
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume126
    journal issue9
    journal titleJournal of Engineering Mechanics
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:9(971)
    treeJournal of Engineering Mechanics:;2000:;Volume ( 126 ):;issue: 009
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian