YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Engineering Mechanics
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Engineering Mechanics
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Equivalence between Kriging and CPDF Methods for Conditional Simulation

    Source: Journal of Engineering Mechanics:;1996:;Volume ( 122 ):;issue: 006
    Author:
    Masanobu Shinozuka
    ,
    Ruichong Zhang
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1996)122:6(530)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Currently the kriging and conditional probability density function (CPDF) methods are widely used in solving the conditional simulation problems involving stochastic processes and fields. For the fundamental understanding of these two methods, this paper considers their applications to the conditional simulation of a one-dimensional, univariate and stationary stochastic process or field. The major findings of this study are as follows. First, the two methods are completely equivalent if the stochastic process is Gaussian with a zero mean. Specifically, the best linear unbiased estimate (BLUE) and the kriging variance are identical to the corresponding conditional mean and variance, respectively. Second, when the kriging method is used, the conditional simulation of a nonzero mean stochastic process (with a known value of the mean) is not equivalent to the (nonzero) mean plus the conditional simulation of the zero mean stochastic process obtained by subtracting the nonzero mean from the original process. Third, it can be shown that the second moment of the process conditionally simulated with the help of the kriging method are not identical to the target second moment (a priori known statistics). Finally, the kriging method is not suitable for the conditional simulation of non-Gaussian stochastic processes if no other assumptions or conditions are made for the reasons indicated in the paper, although the estimation (BLUE) may still be performed, as claimed by its proponents.
    • Download: (1.104Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Equivalence between Kriging and CPDF Methods for Conditional Simulation

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/84425
    Collections
    • Journal of Engineering Mechanics

    Show full item record

    contributor authorMasanobu Shinozuka
    contributor authorRuichong Zhang
    date accessioned2017-05-08T22:37:56Z
    date available2017-05-08T22:37:56Z
    date copyrightJune 1996
    date issued1996
    identifier other%28asce%290733-9399%281996%29122%3A6%28530%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/84425
    description abstractCurrently the kriging and conditional probability density function (CPDF) methods are widely used in solving the conditional simulation problems involving stochastic processes and fields. For the fundamental understanding of these two methods, this paper considers their applications to the conditional simulation of a one-dimensional, univariate and stationary stochastic process or field. The major findings of this study are as follows. First, the two methods are completely equivalent if the stochastic process is Gaussian with a zero mean. Specifically, the best linear unbiased estimate (BLUE) and the kriging variance are identical to the corresponding conditional mean and variance, respectively. Second, when the kriging method is used, the conditional simulation of a nonzero mean stochastic process (with a known value of the mean) is not equivalent to the (nonzero) mean plus the conditional simulation of the zero mean stochastic process obtained by subtracting the nonzero mean from the original process. Third, it can be shown that the second moment of the process conditionally simulated with the help of the kriging method are not identical to the target second moment (a priori known statistics). Finally, the kriging method is not suitable for the conditional simulation of non-Gaussian stochastic processes if no other assumptions or conditions are made for the reasons indicated in the paper, although the estimation (BLUE) may still be performed, as claimed by its proponents.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleEquivalence between Kriging and CPDF Methods for Conditional Simulation
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume122
    journal issue6
    journal titleJournal of Engineering Mechanics
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1996)122:6(530)
    treeJournal of Engineering Mechanics:;1996:;Volume ( 122 ):;issue: 006
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian