YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Evaluation of Estimation of Distribution Algorithm to Calibrate Computationally Intensive Hydrologic Model

    Source: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering:;2016:;Volume ( 021 ):;issue: 006
    Author:
    Zejun Li
    ,
    Pan Liu
    ,
    Chao Deng
    ,
    Shenglian Guo
    ,
    Ping He
    ,
    Caijun Wang
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001350
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: The estimation of distribution algorithm (EDA) is a new evolutionary algorithm developed as an alternative to the traditional genetic algorithm (GA). The EDA guides the search by avoiding the crossover and mutation operators of the GA in favor of building and sampling probabilistic distributions of promising candidate solutions. By increasing the probability of generating solutions with better fitness values, the EDA locates the region of the global optimum or its accurate approximation. In this study, EDA was used to calibrate the parameters of the soil and water assessment tool hydrologic model for the Xunhe River Basin in China. The EDA was compared with three other algorithms: (1) the Multistart Local Metric Stochastic Radial Basis Function algorithm (a surrogate optimization method), (2) the Shuffled Complex Evolution algorithm, and (3) the GA. Four metrics are presented to assess the performance of the algorithms: (1) efficiency in terms of the average best objective function value in a limited number of function evaluations, (2) variability in terms of standard deviation and the box plot, (3) reliability in terms of the empirical cumulative distribution function, and (4) accuracy in terms of the Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient and overall volume error. Results indicated that the EDA is more efficient and could provide more accurate solutions with a relatively high probability, at least for this case study.
    • Download: (2.300Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Evaluation of Estimation of Distribution Algorithm to Calibrate Computationally Intensive Hydrologic Model

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/83180
    Collections
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorZejun Li
    contributor authorPan Liu
    contributor authorChao Deng
    contributor authorShenglian Guo
    contributor authorPing He
    contributor authorCaijun Wang
    date accessioned2017-05-08T22:35:22Z
    date available2017-05-08T22:35:22Z
    date copyrightJune 2016
    date issued2016
    identifier other50823186.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/83180
    description abstractThe estimation of distribution algorithm (EDA) is a new evolutionary algorithm developed as an alternative to the traditional genetic algorithm (GA). The EDA guides the search by avoiding the crossover and mutation operators of the GA in favor of building and sampling probabilistic distributions of promising candidate solutions. By increasing the probability of generating solutions with better fitness values, the EDA locates the region of the global optimum or its accurate approximation. In this study, EDA was used to calibrate the parameters of the soil and water assessment tool hydrologic model for the Xunhe River Basin in China. The EDA was compared with three other algorithms: (1) the Multistart Local Metric Stochastic Radial Basis Function algorithm (a surrogate optimization method), (2) the Shuffled Complex Evolution algorithm, and (3) the GA. Four metrics are presented to assess the performance of the algorithms: (1) efficiency in terms of the average best objective function value in a limited number of function evaluations, (2) variability in terms of standard deviation and the box plot, (3) reliability in terms of the empirical cumulative distribution function, and (4) accuracy in terms of the Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient and overall volume error. Results indicated that the EDA is more efficient and could provide more accurate solutions with a relatively high probability, at least for this case study.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleEvaluation of Estimation of Distribution Algorithm to Calibrate Computationally Intensive Hydrologic Model
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume21
    journal issue6
    journal titleJournal of Hydrologic Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001350
    treeJournal of Hydrologic Engineering:;2016:;Volume ( 021 ):;issue: 006
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian