YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Management in Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Management in Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Construction Innovation: Fifth Generation Perspective

    Source: Journal of Management in Engineering:;2015:;Volume ( 031 ):;issue: 006
    Author:
    Martin Loosemore
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000368
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Despite what many researchers, governments, and commentators say, there is a considerable amount of innovation that occurs in the construction industry. Negative opinions of construction innovation are often misinformed by data and methodologies designed to measure innovation in other sectors and by a misunderstanding of the realities of innovation in the construction industry. A theoretical model of innovation in construction is developed on the basis of fifth-generation innovation research. Through interviews with 58 thought leaders from across the Australian and United Kingdom construction industries, this model is contrasted with what happens in practice to refine a model of innovation that can form the conceptual basis for future research. The findings support but also contrast many aspects of the mainstream innovation literature around fifth-generation innovation. In particular, ideas around systemizing innovation do not sit comfortably with the way that innovation happens in practice in the construction industry. The organization of innovation in construction is a dynamic process that needs to move in response to the different stages of the construction process, starting with an organic approach in early design and tender stages and moving to a more systematic approach during the delivery phase, in which tight budgets and programs demand great discipline. Innovation late on occurs in response to problems rather than in anticipation of opportunities early on and demands a different management approach. Findings also support the crucial role of clients in construction innovation but suggest that most clients care little about this and do not have the tools to assess innovation in bids. There is a fundamental contradiction here that undermines respondents’ preferences for market-led rather than regulation-led innovation, which needs further exploration.
    • Download: (164.8Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Construction Innovation: Fifth Generation Perspective

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/82079
    Collections
    • Journal of Management in Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorMartin Loosemore
    date accessioned2017-05-08T22:31:47Z
    date available2017-05-08T22:31:47Z
    date copyrightNovember 2015
    date issued2015
    identifier other48523680.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/82079
    description abstractDespite what many researchers, governments, and commentators say, there is a considerable amount of innovation that occurs in the construction industry. Negative opinions of construction innovation are often misinformed by data and methodologies designed to measure innovation in other sectors and by a misunderstanding of the realities of innovation in the construction industry. A theoretical model of innovation in construction is developed on the basis of fifth-generation innovation research. Through interviews with 58 thought leaders from across the Australian and United Kingdom construction industries, this model is contrasted with what happens in practice to refine a model of innovation that can form the conceptual basis for future research. The findings support but also contrast many aspects of the mainstream innovation literature around fifth-generation innovation. In particular, ideas around systemizing innovation do not sit comfortably with the way that innovation happens in practice in the construction industry. The organization of innovation in construction is a dynamic process that needs to move in response to the different stages of the construction process, starting with an organic approach in early design and tender stages and moving to a more systematic approach during the delivery phase, in which tight budgets and programs demand great discipline. Innovation late on occurs in response to problems rather than in anticipation of opportunities early on and demands a different management approach. Findings also support the crucial role of clients in construction innovation but suggest that most clients care little about this and do not have the tools to assess innovation in bids. There is a fundamental contradiction here that undermines respondents’ preferences for market-led rather than regulation-led innovation, which needs further exploration.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleConstruction Innovation: Fifth Generation Perspective
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume31
    journal issue6
    journal titleJournal of Management in Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000368
    treeJournal of Management in Engineering:;2015:;Volume ( 031 ):;issue: 006
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian