YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Current Status of Interface Management in Construction: Drivers and Effects of Systematic Interface Management

    Source: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2016:;Volume ( 142 ):;issue: 002
    Author:
    S. Shokri
    ,
    S. Ahn
    ,
    S. Lee
    ,
    C. T. Haas
    ,
    R. C. G. Haas
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001035
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Interface management (IM) is an emerging construction management practice that industry finds necessary for megaprojects that have become more complex and global. Defined as the appropriate management of communications, relationships, and deliverables among stakeholders, effective IM is integral to project success. Yet, because it is an emerging discipline, IM implementation has varied widely across the industry. Furthermore, the effect of IM on project performance is still unclear. To address these gaps, the construction industry institute (CII) chartered a research team, to identify the current state of IM and to investigate the relationship between systematic IM and project performance. To accomplish this, the authors conducted structured interviews for 46 projects. The study results showed that IM practices are most often found in industrial projects, with dollar values of more than one billion. In addition, IM adoption is positively correlated with the project dollar value and number of interface stakeholders. In terms of performance, projects with systematic IM tend to have lower mean and less dispersed cost growth, compared with projects without systematic IM. These results contribute to an understanding of the potential benefits of IM and its appropriate application as it further develops and is used in practice.
    • Download: (1.081Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Current Status of Interface Management in Construction: Drivers and Effects of Systematic Interface Management

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/82060
    Collections
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management

    Show full item record

    contributor authorS. Shokri
    contributor authorS. Ahn
    contributor authorS. Lee
    contributor authorC. T. Haas
    contributor authorR. C. G. Haas
    date accessioned2017-05-08T22:31:45Z
    date available2017-05-08T22:31:45Z
    date copyrightFebruary 2016
    date issued2016
    identifier other48523664.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/82060
    description abstractInterface management (IM) is an emerging construction management practice that industry finds necessary for megaprojects that have become more complex and global. Defined as the appropriate management of communications, relationships, and deliverables among stakeholders, effective IM is integral to project success. Yet, because it is an emerging discipline, IM implementation has varied widely across the industry. Furthermore, the effect of IM on project performance is still unclear. To address these gaps, the construction industry institute (CII) chartered a research team, to identify the current state of IM and to investigate the relationship between systematic IM and project performance. To accomplish this, the authors conducted structured interviews for 46 projects. The study results showed that IM practices are most often found in industrial projects, with dollar values of more than one billion. In addition, IM adoption is positively correlated with the project dollar value and number of interface stakeholders. In terms of performance, projects with systematic IM tend to have lower mean and less dispersed cost growth, compared with projects without systematic IM. These results contribute to an understanding of the potential benefits of IM and its appropriate application as it further develops and is used in practice.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleCurrent Status of Interface Management in Construction: Drivers and Effects of Systematic Interface Management
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume142
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001035
    treeJournal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2016:;Volume ( 142 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian