contributor author | James H. Kane | |
contributor author | B. L. Keshava Kumar | |
contributor author | Richard H. Gallagher | |
date accessioned | 2017-05-08T22:29:05Z | |
date available | 2017-05-08T22:29:05Z | |
date copyright | October 1990 | |
date issued | 1990 | |
identifier other | %28asce%290733-9399%281990%29116%3A10%282293%29.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/81364 | |
description abstract | Iterative reanalysis methods are formulated for use with the boundary‐element analysis (BEA) method. They find application, most commonly, in procedures for the optimum design of structural shapes. Reanalysis strategies that use analysis information from the original (unmodified) BEA model are first established. A scaling technique is then presented to accelerate the rate of convergence and extend the relative amount of modification a model can experience in a convergent iterative reanalysis. Numerous test cases are discussed to demonstrate the effectiveness of these strategies. Timing, storage, and accuracy results are included in these studies. It is shown that the formulated iterative techniques produce displacement and stress results that are as accurate as those produced in a completely new analysis, with less use of computer resources. For the technically important class of continuum problems involving large stress gradients and stress concentration, the iterative techniques are shown to converge for shape modifications beyond the range of those expected to occur in the course of a shape optimization search sequence. | |
publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
title | Boundary‐Element Iterative Reanalysis for Continuum Structures | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 116 | |
journal issue | 10 | |
journal title | Journal of Engineering Mechanics | |
identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1990)116:10(2293) | |
tree | Journal of Engineering Mechanics:;1990:;Volume ( 116 ):;issue: 010 | |
contenttype | Fulltext | |