YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Aerospace Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Aerospace Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Back-Analysis and Parameter Identification for Deep Excavation Based on Pareto Multiobjective Optimization

    Source: Journal of Aerospace Engineering:;2015:;Volume ( 028 ):;issue: 006
    Author:
    Z. H. Huang
    ,
    L. L. Zhang
    ,
    S. Y. Cheng
    ,
    J. Zhang
    ,
    X. H. Xia
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000464
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: In this paper, a back-analysis method of deep excavation based on the Pareto multiobjective optimization is proposed and a multiobjective optimization algorithm multialgorithm genetically adaptive multiobjective method (AMALGAM) is implemented in a commercial FEM software to identify soil parameters based on multiple types of field observations. The proposed method is applied to a well-instrumented deep excavation, i.e., the Taipei National Enterprise Center (TNEC) project. The observed wall deflection and ground surface settlement at Stage 3 of the excavation are simultaneously used to estimate the nine soil parameters of the modified Cam-clay (MCC) model for three clay layers. The Pareto front in the biobjective space exhibits a rectangular shape, which implies that the simultaneous minimization of both objectives can be achieved. The back-analyzed soil parameters of the compromise solution from the biobjective back-analysis can reasonably simulate both the wall deflection and ground surface settlement for Stage 3. The differences of the predictions and the actual observations for Stages 4 to 7 using the back-analyzed soil parameters from Stage 3 are mainly because the inadequacy of the MCC model to simulate the small strain soil behaviors of excavation.
    • Download: (3.985Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Back-Analysis and Parameter Identification for Deep Excavation Based on Pareto Multiobjective Optimization

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/81150
    Collections
    • Journal of Aerospace Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorZ. H. Huang
    contributor authorL. L. Zhang
    contributor authorS. Y. Cheng
    contributor authorJ. Zhang
    contributor authorX. H. Xia
    date accessioned2017-05-08T22:28:18Z
    date available2017-05-08T22:28:18Z
    date copyrightNovember 2015
    date issued2015
    identifier other46025376.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/81150
    description abstractIn this paper, a back-analysis method of deep excavation based on the Pareto multiobjective optimization is proposed and a multiobjective optimization algorithm multialgorithm genetically adaptive multiobjective method (AMALGAM) is implemented in a commercial FEM software to identify soil parameters based on multiple types of field observations. The proposed method is applied to a well-instrumented deep excavation, i.e., the Taipei National Enterprise Center (TNEC) project. The observed wall deflection and ground surface settlement at Stage 3 of the excavation are simultaneously used to estimate the nine soil parameters of the modified Cam-clay (MCC) model for three clay layers. The Pareto front in the biobjective space exhibits a rectangular shape, which implies that the simultaneous minimization of both objectives can be achieved. The back-analyzed soil parameters of the compromise solution from the biobjective back-analysis can reasonably simulate both the wall deflection and ground surface settlement for Stage 3. The differences of the predictions and the actual observations for Stages 4 to 7 using the back-analyzed soil parameters from Stage 3 are mainly because the inadequacy of the MCC model to simulate the small strain soil behaviors of excavation.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleBack-Analysis and Parameter Identification for Deep Excavation Based on Pareto Multiobjective Optimization
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume28
    journal issue6
    journal titleJournal of Aerospace Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000464
    treeJournal of Aerospace Engineering:;2015:;Volume ( 028 ):;issue: 006
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian