YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • International Journal of Geomechanics
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • International Journal of Geomechanics
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Fundamental Issues of Elastic Viscoplastic Modeling of the Time-Dependent Stress–Strain Behavior of Geomaterials

    Source: International Journal of Geomechanics:;2015:;Volume ( 015 ):;issue: 005
    Author:
    Jian-Hua
    ,
    Yin
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000485
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: In this paper, a number of fundamental concepts are presented and explained. These include (1) differences among an instant compression line, a normal consolidation line, and a true instant compression line; (2) the uniqueness of viscoplastic strain rates with a stress–strain state; (3) whether the creep compression is smaller than the instant compression; (4) the separation of the total strain rates; (5) the relation between elastic–plastic models and elastic viscoplastic (EVP) models, etc. The major conclusions are the following: (1) the elastic compression is the true instant compression; (2) the magnitude of a creep-strain rate at a stress–strain state point is unique, independent of the loading path to reach this point; (3) the true instant (elastic) compression is much smaller than the creep compression; (4) it is more appropriate that strain rates of geomaterials are composed of elastic strain rates and viscoplastic strain rates; (5) the one-dimensional (1D) EVP (1D EVP) is a genuine extension of Maxwell’s linear rheological model for considering the nonlinear behavior of soils; (6) the EVP model is more general than an elastic–plastic model; (7) the nonlinear functions proposed by the author are good for fitting the creep compression and the compression under high stress of most soft soils in 1D straining; and (8) the three-dimensional EVP model is rigorously derived using the 1D EVP model approach and the modified Cam–Clay model, but further improvements of this model are still needed. At the end, a number of areas are presented for further study.
    • Download: (620.4Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Fundamental Issues of Elastic Viscoplastic Modeling of the Time-Dependent Stress–Strain Behavior of Geomaterials

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/80959
    Collections
    • International Journal of Geomechanics

    Show full item record

    contributor authorJian-Hua
    contributor authorYin
    date accessioned2017-05-08T22:27:35Z
    date available2017-05-08T22:27:35Z
    date copyrightOctober 2015
    date issued2015
    identifier other45766151.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/80959
    description abstractIn this paper, a number of fundamental concepts are presented and explained. These include (1) differences among an instant compression line, a normal consolidation line, and a true instant compression line; (2) the uniqueness of viscoplastic strain rates with a stress–strain state; (3) whether the creep compression is smaller than the instant compression; (4) the separation of the total strain rates; (5) the relation between elastic–plastic models and elastic viscoplastic (EVP) models, etc. The major conclusions are the following: (1) the elastic compression is the true instant compression; (2) the magnitude of a creep-strain rate at a stress–strain state point is unique, independent of the loading path to reach this point; (3) the true instant (elastic) compression is much smaller than the creep compression; (4) it is more appropriate that strain rates of geomaterials are composed of elastic strain rates and viscoplastic strain rates; (5) the one-dimensional (1D) EVP (1D EVP) is a genuine extension of Maxwell’s linear rheological model for considering the nonlinear behavior of soils; (6) the EVP model is more general than an elastic–plastic model; (7) the nonlinear functions proposed by the author are good for fitting the creep compression and the compression under high stress of most soft soils in 1D straining; and (8) the three-dimensional EVP model is rigorously derived using the 1D EVP model approach and the modified Cam–Clay model, but further improvements of this model are still needed. At the end, a number of areas are presented for further study.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleFundamental Issues of Elastic Viscoplastic Modeling of the Time-Dependent Stress–Strain Behavior of Geomaterials
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume15
    journal issue5
    journal titleInternational Journal of Geomechanics
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000485
    treeInternational Journal of Geomechanics:;2015:;Volume ( 015 ):;issue: 005
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian