YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    How Reliable Are ANN, ANFIS, and SVM Techniques for Predicting Longitudinal Dispersion Coefficient in Natural Rivers?

    Source: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering:;2016:;Volume ( 142 ):;issue: 001
    Author:
    Roohollah Noori
    ,
    Zhiqiang Deng
    ,
    Amin Kiaghadi
    ,
    Fatemeh Torabi Kachoosangi
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001062
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Determination of longitudinal dispersion coefficient (LDC) using artificial intelligence (AI) techniques can improve environmental management strategies for river systems. However, the uncertainty involved in AI models has rarely been reported. The main objective of this paper was to investigate the reliability of three AI-based techniques, including the artificial neural network (ANN), adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), and support vector machine (SVM), for predicting the LDC in natural rivers. To that end, LDC predictions were first carried out using ANN, ANFIS, and SVM techniques. Then, a forward selection (FS) and gamma test (GT) were conducted to sort input variables according to their importance and effects on LDC prediction. Finally, uncertainties in the model predictions were analyzed to answer the question, “How reliable are ANN, ANFIS, and SVM techniques?” It was found that model inputs could not be satisfactorily sorted by a linear method (i.e., FS) due to the complex and nonlinear nature of LDC. Thus, the nonlinear GT technique was chosen as a suitable input selection method for prediction of LDC. The results or model input variables selected from the GT technique showed good consistency with previous researches. Furthermore, the reliability of ANN, ANFIS, and SVM models was calculated and tabulated by an uncertainty estimation for LDC prediction. A high uncertainty was found in the models although they predicted LDC appropriately. It was also found that the uncertainty in the SVM model was less than those in the ANN and ANFIS models for estimating the LDC in natural rivers. The ANFIS model performs better than the ANN model.
    • Download: (2.363Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      How Reliable Are ANN, ANFIS, and SVM Techniques for Predicting Longitudinal Dispersion Coefficient in Natural Rivers?

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/80333
    Collections
    • Journal of Hydraulic Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorRoohollah Noori
    contributor authorZhiqiang Deng
    contributor authorAmin Kiaghadi
    contributor authorFatemeh Torabi Kachoosangi
    date accessioned2017-05-08T22:25:18Z
    date available2017-05-08T22:25:18Z
    date copyrightJanuary 2016
    date issued2016
    identifier other44371560.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/80333
    description abstractDetermination of longitudinal dispersion coefficient (LDC) using artificial intelligence (AI) techniques can improve environmental management strategies for river systems. However, the uncertainty involved in AI models has rarely been reported. The main objective of this paper was to investigate the reliability of three AI-based techniques, including the artificial neural network (ANN), adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), and support vector machine (SVM), for predicting the LDC in natural rivers. To that end, LDC predictions were first carried out using ANN, ANFIS, and SVM techniques. Then, a forward selection (FS) and gamma test (GT) were conducted to sort input variables according to their importance and effects on LDC prediction. Finally, uncertainties in the model predictions were analyzed to answer the question, “How reliable are ANN, ANFIS, and SVM techniques?” It was found that model inputs could not be satisfactorily sorted by a linear method (i.e., FS) due to the complex and nonlinear nature of LDC. Thus, the nonlinear GT technique was chosen as a suitable input selection method for prediction of LDC. The results or model input variables selected from the GT technique showed good consistency with previous researches. Furthermore, the reliability of ANN, ANFIS, and SVM models was calculated and tabulated by an uncertainty estimation for LDC prediction. A high uncertainty was found in the models although they predicted LDC appropriately. It was also found that the uncertainty in the SVM model was less than those in the ANN and ANFIS models for estimating the LDC in natural rivers. The ANFIS model performs better than the ANN model.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleHow Reliable Are ANN, ANFIS, and SVM Techniques for Predicting Longitudinal Dispersion Coefficient in Natural Rivers?
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume142
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Hydraulic Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001062
    treeJournal of Hydraulic Engineering:;2016:;Volume ( 142 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian