Seismic Behavior of Frame-Wall-Rocking Foundation Systems. II: Dynamic Test PhaseSource: Journal of Structural Engineering:;2015:;Volume ( 141 ):;issue: 012Author:Weian Liu
,
Tara C. Hutchinson
,
Andreas G. Gavras
,
Bruce L. Kutter
,
Manouchehr Hakhamaneshi
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001313Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Abstract: This paper presents the earthquake response of three low-rise frame-wall-foundation centrifuge building models, including a structural hinging-dominated, foundation rocking-dominated, and balanced design model. The models were designed such that the capacities of the dominant inelastic elements varied; however, each was subjected to a similar sequence of earthquake shaking in a 30-g centrifuge environment to facilitate comparison. Experimental results reveal that the traditional frame-wall building with a strong foundation (i.e., a hinging-dominated system) has the least potential to recover from displacements induced during earthquake shaking. As a result, this system suffered the most significant residual deformation. In contrast, systems with rocking foundations sustained a smaller peak roof acceleration, residual drift, and peak base shear despite the relatively larger peak transient drift demand. Consistent with slow cyclic test results, dissipated hysteretic energy was reasonably distributed amongst superstructure and substructure inelastic components in the balanced model during moderate and high intensity shaking.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Weian Liu | |
contributor author | Tara C. Hutchinson | |
contributor author | Andreas G. Gavras | |
contributor author | Bruce L. Kutter | |
contributor author | Manouchehr Hakhamaneshi | |
date accessioned | 2017-05-08T22:24:47Z | |
date available | 2017-05-08T22:24:47Z | |
date copyright | December 2015 | |
date issued | 2015 | |
identifier other | 44253437.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/80124 | |
description abstract | This paper presents the earthquake response of three low-rise frame-wall-foundation centrifuge building models, including a structural hinging-dominated, foundation rocking-dominated, and balanced design model. The models were designed such that the capacities of the dominant inelastic elements varied; however, each was subjected to a similar sequence of earthquake shaking in a 30-g centrifuge environment to facilitate comparison. Experimental results reveal that the traditional frame-wall building with a strong foundation (i.e., a hinging-dominated system) has the least potential to recover from displacements induced during earthquake shaking. As a result, this system suffered the most significant residual deformation. In contrast, systems with rocking foundations sustained a smaller peak roof acceleration, residual drift, and peak base shear despite the relatively larger peak transient drift demand. Consistent with slow cyclic test results, dissipated hysteretic energy was reasonably distributed amongst superstructure and substructure inelastic components in the balanced model during moderate and high intensity shaking. | |
publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
title | Seismic Behavior of Frame-Wall-Rocking Foundation Systems. II: Dynamic Test Phase | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 141 | |
journal issue | 12 | |
journal title | Journal of Structural Engineering | |
identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001313 | |
tree | Journal of Structural Engineering:;2015:;Volume ( 141 ):;issue: 012 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |