Understanding and Managing Public/Private PartnershipsSource: Journal of Management in Engineering:;1990:;Volume ( 006 ):;issue: 001Author:Stephen C. Mitchell
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)9742-597X(1990)6:1(29)Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Abstract: The paper develops the rationale for two distinct types of public‐private partnerships. It develops the thesis of public‐private partnerships as cooperative efforts between the private and public sectors in the areas of technical, professional, and educational activities as well as research, management, and public policy. “Soft” partnerships are needed to further the objectives of the civil‐engineering profession, which is, to the writer, one of public service and public benefit. The paper also deals with the subject of privatization. Privatization is defined and examples of successful efforts are reviewed. The current status of privatization, the expanded complexity of privatization today, advantages, funding, and legal considerations are surveyed in general. Privatization is presented as a “hard” public‐private partnership: hard in the sense that there is a specific contract between the public and private sectors. The overall thrust of the paper is that public‐private partnerships are a good thing; that both soft and hard partnerships are needed and, in fact, prerequisites of each other; and that soft partnerships are necessary. Soft partnerships promote communications, understanding, and the development of common ground.
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | Stephen C. Mitchell | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-08T22:23:20Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-08T22:23:20Z | |
| date copyright | January 1990 | |
| date issued | 1990 | |
| identifier other | 43886400.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/79338 | |
| description abstract | The paper develops the rationale for two distinct types of public‐private partnerships. It develops the thesis of public‐private partnerships as cooperative efforts between the private and public sectors in the areas of technical, professional, and educational activities as well as research, management, and public policy. “Soft” partnerships are needed to further the objectives of the civil‐engineering profession, which is, to the writer, one of public service and public benefit. The paper also deals with the subject of privatization. Privatization is defined and examples of successful efforts are reviewed. The current status of privatization, the expanded complexity of privatization today, advantages, funding, and legal considerations are surveyed in general. Privatization is presented as a “hard” public‐private partnership: hard in the sense that there is a specific contract between the public and private sectors. The overall thrust of the paper is that public‐private partnerships are a good thing; that both soft and hard partnerships are needed and, in fact, prerequisites of each other; and that soft partnerships are necessary. Soft partnerships promote communications, understanding, and the development of common ground. | |
| publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| title | Understanding and Managing Public/Private Partnerships | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 6 | |
| journal issue | 1 | |
| journal title | Journal of Management in Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)9742-597X(1990)6:1(29) | |
| tree | Journal of Management in Engineering:;1990:;Volume ( 006 ):;issue: 001 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |