Direct Approach to Extracting 18 Flutter Derivatives of Bridge Decks and Vulnerability Analysis on Identification AccuracySource: Journal of Aerospace Engineering:;2015:;Volume ( 028 ):;issue: 003Author:F. Y. Xu
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000413Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Abstract: The extraction of 18 flutter derivatives of bridge decks from three degree-of-freedom (3-DOF) free vibration data using a novel direct approach is addressed in this study. Different with many conventional methods that construct a system state matrix, this approach directly extracts 18 flutter derivatives using the aeroelastically modified modal parameters. No state matrix is concerned, and thus it is more straightforward from the physical essence viewpoint. The validity and accuracy are demonstrated by a 3-DOF numerical example for bridge deck model. Afterward, the 18 flutter derivatives of two exact bridge decks with representative streamlined and bluff sections are extracted. Detailed deterministic and stochastic vulnerability analyses on identification accuracy of modal parameters and flutter derivatives were conducted for the numerical model and two bridge decks. For the free vibration method, the potential uncertainties in aeroelastic parameter determination are investigated, and the causes of low accuracy of some flutter derivatives (e.g.,
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | F. Y. Xu | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-08T22:20:52Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-08T22:20:52Z | |
| date copyright | May 2015 | |
| date issued | 2015 | |
| identifier other | 42676547.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/78329 | |
| description abstract | The extraction of 18 flutter derivatives of bridge decks from three degree-of-freedom (3-DOF) free vibration data using a novel direct approach is addressed in this study. Different with many conventional methods that construct a system state matrix, this approach directly extracts 18 flutter derivatives using the aeroelastically modified modal parameters. No state matrix is concerned, and thus it is more straightforward from the physical essence viewpoint. The validity and accuracy are demonstrated by a 3-DOF numerical example for bridge deck model. Afterward, the 18 flutter derivatives of two exact bridge decks with representative streamlined and bluff sections are extracted. Detailed deterministic and stochastic vulnerability analyses on identification accuracy of modal parameters and flutter derivatives were conducted for the numerical model and two bridge decks. For the free vibration method, the potential uncertainties in aeroelastic parameter determination are investigated, and the causes of low accuracy of some flutter derivatives (e.g., | |
| publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| title | Direct Approach to Extracting 18 Flutter Derivatives of Bridge Decks and Vulnerability Analysis on Identification Accuracy | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 28 | |
| journal issue | 3 | |
| journal title | Journal of Aerospace Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000413 | |
| tree | Journal of Aerospace Engineering:;2015:;Volume ( 028 ):;issue: 003 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |