YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Surveying Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Surveying Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Earthwork Volumetrics with an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle and Softcopy Photogrammetry

    Source: Journal of Surveying Engineering:;2015:;Volume ( 141 ):;issue: 001
    Author:
    Chris H.
    ,
    Hugenholtz
    ,
    Jordan
    ,
    Walker
    ,
    Owen
    ,
    Brown
    ,
    Steve
    ,
    Myshak
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000138
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Small unmanned/uninhabited aerial vehicles (UAVs) are quickly becoming a cost-effective alternative for mapping and volumetrics, particularly for small- to medium-sized earthwork projects. However, the accuracy of photogrammetrically derived digital terrain models (DTMs) from UAV imagery is not extensively tested. This gap is addressed through a case study of stockpile volume estimation. A gravel stockpile was surveyed with a vertical take-off and landing UAV before and after a portion of it was excavated. Softcopy photogrammetry was applied to the UAV images to produce before and after DTMs, each with a resolution of 3.5 cm. The vertical accuracy of the UAV DTMs was estimated with global positioning system (GPS) test points, yielding RMS errors of 0.106 (before) and 0.097 m (after). These errors are similar to, if not lower, than those produced by airborne light detection and ranging (LIDAR), in general, but are higher than for terrestrial laser scanning. The before and after volume of the stockpile estimated from the UAV DTMs was 2.6 and 3.9% lower than the volume estimated from GPS-interpolated DTMs. By differencing the two UAV DTMs, the volume of gravel extracted from the stockpile was estimated and compared with a haul ticket. According to the latter, the extracted volume was
    • Download: (559.0Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Earthwork Volumetrics with an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle and Softcopy Photogrammetry

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/77905
    Collections
    • Journal of Surveying Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorChris H.
    contributor authorHugenholtz
    contributor authorJordan
    contributor authorWalker
    contributor authorOwen
    contributor authorBrown
    contributor authorSteve
    contributor authorMyshak
    date accessioned2017-05-08T22:20:00Z
    date available2017-05-08T22:20:00Z
    date copyrightFebruary 2015
    date issued2015
    identifier other41216803.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/77905
    description abstractSmall unmanned/uninhabited aerial vehicles (UAVs) are quickly becoming a cost-effective alternative for mapping and volumetrics, particularly for small- to medium-sized earthwork projects. However, the accuracy of photogrammetrically derived digital terrain models (DTMs) from UAV imagery is not extensively tested. This gap is addressed through a case study of stockpile volume estimation. A gravel stockpile was surveyed with a vertical take-off and landing UAV before and after a portion of it was excavated. Softcopy photogrammetry was applied to the UAV images to produce before and after DTMs, each with a resolution of 3.5 cm. The vertical accuracy of the UAV DTMs was estimated with global positioning system (GPS) test points, yielding RMS errors of 0.106 (before) and 0.097 m (after). These errors are similar to, if not lower, than those produced by airborne light detection and ranging (LIDAR), in general, but are higher than for terrestrial laser scanning. The before and after volume of the stockpile estimated from the UAV DTMs was 2.6 and 3.9% lower than the volume estimated from GPS-interpolated DTMs. By differencing the two UAV DTMs, the volume of gravel extracted from the stockpile was estimated and compared with a haul ticket. According to the latter, the extracted volume was
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleEarthwork Volumetrics with an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle and Softcopy Photogrammetry
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume141
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Surveying Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000138
    treeJournal of Surveying Engineering:;2015:;Volume ( 141 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian