YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Composites for Construction
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Composites for Construction
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Bonding Behavior of Wet-Bonded GFRP-Concrete Interface

    Source: Journal of Composites for Construction:;2015:;Volume ( 019 ):;issue: 006
    Author:
    Lei Zhang
    ,
    Wen-Wei Wang
    ,
    Kent A. Harries
    ,
    Jun Tian
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000550
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: An experimental study was conducted to investigate the interfacial behavior between glass-fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) plate and cast-in-place (CIP) concrete placed against this plate—a method known as wet-bonding. The experimental program consisted of 33 single-shear specimens with various initial placement times of concrete, durations of concrete curing, and interface preparations. Control specimens using a conventional dry-bonded technique were also tested. A model was proposed that was able to predict the interfacial ultimate pullout load and local shear stress-slip relationship of a wet-bonded interface with reasonable accuracy. It is shown that (1) wet-bonded interfaces exhibit lower capacity and interfacial fracture energy than dry-bonded interfaces although the load to cause initiation of debonding is not significantly different; (2) the time of initial placement of the CIP concrete onto the wet, set, or cured resin significantly influences the ultimate pullout load and interfacial fracture energy. When initial placement of concrete follows initial set of the resin, at about 30 min, the ultimate pullout load and interfacial fracture energy are greatest; and (3) the nature of the interface also strongly affects the ultimate pullout load and interfacial fracture energy. Specimens in which fine aggregate is spead onto the resin immediately after its placement exhibit improved interface performance. Nonetheless, wet-bonded interfaces do not approach the capacity of conventional dry-bonded interfaces.
    • Download: (7.598Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Bonding Behavior of Wet-Bonded GFRP-Concrete Interface

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/76592
    Collections
    • Journal of Composites for Construction

    Show full item record

    contributor authorLei Zhang
    contributor authorWen-Wei Wang
    contributor authorKent A. Harries
    contributor authorJun Tian
    date accessioned2017-05-08T22:17:45Z
    date available2017-05-08T22:17:45Z
    date copyrightDecember 2015
    date issued2015
    identifier other40135149.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/76592
    description abstractAn experimental study was conducted to investigate the interfacial behavior between glass-fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) plate and cast-in-place (CIP) concrete placed against this plate—a method known as wet-bonding. The experimental program consisted of 33 single-shear specimens with various initial placement times of concrete, durations of concrete curing, and interface preparations. Control specimens using a conventional dry-bonded technique were also tested. A model was proposed that was able to predict the interfacial ultimate pullout load and local shear stress-slip relationship of a wet-bonded interface with reasonable accuracy. It is shown that (1) wet-bonded interfaces exhibit lower capacity and interfacial fracture energy than dry-bonded interfaces although the load to cause initiation of debonding is not significantly different; (2) the time of initial placement of the CIP concrete onto the wet, set, or cured resin significantly influences the ultimate pullout load and interfacial fracture energy. When initial placement of concrete follows initial set of the resin, at about 30 min, the ultimate pullout load and interfacial fracture energy are greatest; and (3) the nature of the interface also strongly affects the ultimate pullout load and interfacial fracture energy. Specimens in which fine aggregate is spead onto the resin immediately after its placement exhibit improved interface performance. Nonetheless, wet-bonded interfaces do not approach the capacity of conventional dry-bonded interfaces.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleBonding Behavior of Wet-Bonded GFRP-Concrete Interface
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume19
    journal issue6
    journal titleJournal of Composites for Construction
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000550
    treeJournal of Composites for Construction:;2015:;Volume ( 019 ):;issue: 006
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian