YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Automation and Robotics Opportunities: Construction versus Manufacturing

    Source: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management:;1994:;Volume ( 120 ):;issue: 002
    Author:
    John G. Everett
    ,
    Alexander H. Slocum
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1994)120:2(443)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Automation and robots are frequently mentioned as solutions to industrywide problems of increasing costs, declining productivity, skilled‐labor short‐ages, safety, and quality control. Despite numerous attempts to develop automation and robotics for construction field operations, few practical applications can be found on construction sites today. The promises of robotics remain unfulfilled, and attempts to transfer automation technology from manufacturing have not been optimal. Identification of opportunities for automation requires analysis of construction work at the appropriate level. This paper presents a hierarchical taxonomy that divides construction field operations into several levels. The basic‐task level is the appropriate level for construction automation. The paper presents a set of basic tasks that describe construction field work. Construction is compared to highly repetitive manufacturing operations to gain insight into the relationships among product design, process design, and fabrication. In manufacturing, product and process design are closely interrelated. In construction, process design is completely separate from product design, but is intimately related to fabrication. Until construction product and process design become more highly integrated, automation must occur at the basic‐task level. Advances in construction automation will continue to be characterized by a machine performing physically intensive basic tasks, operated by a human craftsperson performing the information‐intensive basic tasks.
    • Download: (669.0Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Automation and Robotics Opportunities: Construction versus Manufacturing

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/73841
    Collections
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management

    Show full item record

    contributor authorJohn G. Everett
    contributor authorAlexander H. Slocum
    date accessioned2017-05-08T22:12:53Z
    date available2017-05-08T22:12:53Z
    date copyrightJune 1994
    date issued1994
    identifier other%28asce%290733-9364%281994%29120%3A2%28443%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/73841
    description abstractAutomation and robots are frequently mentioned as solutions to industrywide problems of increasing costs, declining productivity, skilled‐labor short‐ages, safety, and quality control. Despite numerous attempts to develop automation and robotics for construction field operations, few practical applications can be found on construction sites today. The promises of robotics remain unfulfilled, and attempts to transfer automation technology from manufacturing have not been optimal. Identification of opportunities for automation requires analysis of construction work at the appropriate level. This paper presents a hierarchical taxonomy that divides construction field operations into several levels. The basic‐task level is the appropriate level for construction automation. The paper presents a set of basic tasks that describe construction field work. Construction is compared to highly repetitive manufacturing operations to gain insight into the relationships among product design, process design, and fabrication. In manufacturing, product and process design are closely interrelated. In construction, process design is completely separate from product design, but is intimately related to fabrication. Until construction product and process design become more highly integrated, automation must occur at the basic‐task level. Advances in construction automation will continue to be characterized by a machine performing physically intensive basic tasks, operated by a human craftsperson performing the information‐intensive basic tasks.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleAutomation and Robotics Opportunities: Construction versus Manufacturing
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume120
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1994)120:2(443)
    treeJournal of Construction Engineering and Management:;1994:;Volume ( 120 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian