YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Sensor-Based Cutoff Strategy for Border Check–Irrigated Fields

    Source: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;2015:;Volume ( 141 ):;issue: 007
    Author:
    Brad J. Arnold
    ,
    Shrinivasa K. Upadhyaya
    ,
    Wesley W. Wallender
    ,
    Mark E. Grismer
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000855
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Inflow cutoff, or turning off water inflow to an irrigated field based on water advance location downfield, is commonly used by irrigators as a means of reducing tail discharge (runoff) during surface irrigation of forage and range crops. To apply a scientifically sound cutoff strategy using a calculated inflow cutoff time or cutoff advance location, multiple field parameters (e.g., water inflow rate, rate of water advancement) need to be measured using multiple (potentially expensive) sensors and instrumentation. In this study, a sensor-based irrigation inflow cutoff strategy for surface irrigation was developed that deploys simple wireless contact-type sensors to measure wetting-front arrival time and surface water depth along a border check during the advance phase. These data were coupled with a multi-irrigation volume balance model (i.e., separate model parts for initial and subsequent irrigations of growing season) to determine appropriate cutoff times and/or locations, based on user-defined runoff and approximations of inflow rates and infiltrated depths. The model was verified using the field data collected during irrigation of a border-irrigated alfalfa field near Davis, California. The inflow rate corresponding to the initial (i.e., first of a growing season) irrigation event was within a 95% confidence interval of the measured inflow rates for all subsequent irrigations, in which identical irrigation setups were maintained. Moreover, a correlation between model approximated and reference infiltration depths was found with a coefficient of determination value (
    • Download: (433.5Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Sensor-Based Cutoff Strategy for Border Check–Irrigated Fields

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/73204
    Collections
    • Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorBrad J. Arnold
    contributor authorShrinivasa K. Upadhyaya
    contributor authorWesley W. Wallender
    contributor authorMark E. Grismer
    date accessioned2017-05-08T22:11:40Z
    date available2017-05-08T22:11:40Z
    date copyrightJuly 2015
    date issued2015
    identifier other39203970.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/73204
    description abstractInflow cutoff, or turning off water inflow to an irrigated field based on water advance location downfield, is commonly used by irrigators as a means of reducing tail discharge (runoff) during surface irrigation of forage and range crops. To apply a scientifically sound cutoff strategy using a calculated inflow cutoff time or cutoff advance location, multiple field parameters (e.g., water inflow rate, rate of water advancement) need to be measured using multiple (potentially expensive) sensors and instrumentation. In this study, a sensor-based irrigation inflow cutoff strategy for surface irrigation was developed that deploys simple wireless contact-type sensors to measure wetting-front arrival time and surface water depth along a border check during the advance phase. These data were coupled with a multi-irrigation volume balance model (i.e., separate model parts for initial and subsequent irrigations of growing season) to determine appropriate cutoff times and/or locations, based on user-defined runoff and approximations of inflow rates and infiltrated depths. The model was verified using the field data collected during irrigation of a border-irrigated alfalfa field near Davis, California. The inflow rate corresponding to the initial (i.e., first of a growing season) irrigation event was within a 95% confidence interval of the measured inflow rates for all subsequent irrigations, in which identical irrigation setups were maintained. Moreover, a correlation between model approximated and reference infiltration depths was found with a coefficient of determination value (
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleSensor-Based Cutoff Strategy for Border Check–Irrigated Fields
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume141
    journal issue7
    journal titleJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000855
    treeJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;2015:;Volume ( 141 ):;issue: 007
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian