Show simple item record

contributor authorAbeera Batool
contributor authorDaniel R. VandenBerge
contributor authorThomas L. Brandon
date accessioned2017-05-08T22:11:21Z
date available2017-05-08T22:11:21Z
date copyrightApril 2015
date issued2015
identifier other38103657.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/73112
description abstractThe U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ blanket theory has been successfully used to evaluate levee underseepage for many years. The method was developed from closed-form analytical solutions based on the principles of groundwater hydrology. More recently, the proliferation of computing resources has made finite-element analysis (FEA) a tool that is easily accessible to many geotechnical engineers. This study compares the results of blanket theory to FEA to delineate conditions in which the two methods provide essentially the same solution. The assumptions inherent to blanket theory are reviewed to provide designers with an understanding of its usefulness and limitations. Guidelines are provided for correctly assigning FEA boundary conditions that are consistent with the assumptions of blanket theory. For cases in which all of the assumptions are satisfied, the volumetric flow rate and excess head at the levee toe predicted by blanket theory were within 10% of those determined by using FEA.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titlePractical Application of Blanket Theory and the Finite-Element Method to Levee Underseepage Analysis
typeJournal Paper
journal volume141
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001269
treeJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering:;2015:;Volume ( 141 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record