YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Evaluating Ensemble Kalman, Particle, and Ensemble Particle Filters through Soil Temperature Prediction

    Source: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering:;2014:;Volume ( 019 ):;issue: 012
    Author:
    Zhongbo Yu
    ,
    Xiaolei Fu
    ,
    Haishen Lü
    ,
    Lifeng Luo
    ,
    Di Liu
    ,
    Qin Ju
    ,
    Long Xiang
    ,
    Zongzhi Wang
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000976
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Data assimilation is a useful tool in hydrologic and agricultural application studies because of its ability to produce predicted results with high accuracy. However, different data-assimilation methods have different performances for a given application. Although the popular ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) performs well with Gaussian distribution, the error is difficult to conform to the Gaussian distribution. To take advantage of the EnKF, this study presents a new data-assimilation method, ensemble particle filter (EnPF), which is an integration of the EnKF and the particle filter (PF). This new method was evaluated in comparison with two existing methods (EnKF and PF) through soil temperature predictions. The simple biosphere model (SiB2) and the filters were assessed with observations from the Wudaogou experimental area in the Huaihe River basin, China. Results show that when the time interval increases adequately, all the simulated or assimilated results improve significantly. All of these filters tend to be more stable when the number of particles reaches a certain amount (e.g., 60) or the variance is small (e.g., less than 0.6) in the study. When the number of particles is less than a threshold value (e.g., 30), the advantage among these three methods is not appreciable. The error obtained by EnPF is smaller than that by EnKF and PF; this means that EnPF performs better than EnKF and PF.
    • Download: (4.753Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Evaluating Ensemble Kalman, Particle, and Ensemble Particle Filters through Soil Temperature Prediction

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/72684
    Collections
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorZhongbo Yu
    contributor authorXiaolei Fu
    contributor authorHaishen Lü
    contributor authorLifeng Luo
    contributor authorDi Liu
    contributor authorQin Ju
    contributor authorLong Xiang
    contributor authorZongzhi Wang
    date accessioned2017-05-08T22:09:59Z
    date available2017-05-08T22:09:59Z
    date copyrightDecember 2014
    date issued2014
    identifier other36716485.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/72684
    description abstractData assimilation is a useful tool in hydrologic and agricultural application studies because of its ability to produce predicted results with high accuracy. However, different data-assimilation methods have different performances for a given application. Although the popular ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) performs well with Gaussian distribution, the error is difficult to conform to the Gaussian distribution. To take advantage of the EnKF, this study presents a new data-assimilation method, ensemble particle filter (EnPF), which is an integration of the EnKF and the particle filter (PF). This new method was evaluated in comparison with two existing methods (EnKF and PF) through soil temperature predictions. The simple biosphere model (SiB2) and the filters were assessed with observations from the Wudaogou experimental area in the Huaihe River basin, China. Results show that when the time interval increases adequately, all the simulated or assimilated results improve significantly. All of these filters tend to be more stable when the number of particles reaches a certain amount (e.g., 60) or the variance is small (e.g., less than 0.6) in the study. When the number of particles is less than a threshold value (e.g., 30), the advantage among these three methods is not appreciable. The error obtained by EnPF is smaller than that by EnKF and PF; this means that EnPF performs better than EnKF and PF.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleEvaluating Ensemble Kalman, Particle, and Ensemble Particle Filters through Soil Temperature Prediction
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume19
    journal issue12
    journal titleJournal of Hydrologic Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000976
    treeJournal of Hydrologic Engineering:;2014:;Volume ( 019 ):;issue: 012
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian