YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Evaluation of the Areal Reduction Factor in an Urban Area through Rainfall Records of Limited Length: A Case Study

    Source: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering:;2014:;Volume ( 019 ):;issue: 011
    Author:
    Giuseppe Barbero
    ,
    Ugo Moisello
    ,
    Sara Todeschini
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001022
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: This paper addresses the determination of the areal reduction factor (ARF) as a function of area and duration. The analysis is carried out using the data recorded in a 10-year period at the rainfall gauge network of the city of Milan (Italy). Four types of probability distributions [exponential, the extreme value type 1 (EV1), the generalized extreme value (GEV), and generalized Pareto], two parameter estimation methods (probability-weighted moments and partial probability-weighted moments), and four different regression models of ARF on area and duration are considered. A sensitivity analysis is carried out to outline the effect exerted on ARF by the choice of probability distribution and the parameter estimation method and by that of the model. The effect of model choice is more important than the choice of the distribution and estimation method. The models that fit the data best are the newly developed ones. The ARF model that has the best fit presents a root-mean-square error (RMSE) equal to 0.0204. This ARF error is very acceptable for practical purposes. The computed areal rainfall quantiles show inconsistencies, which are likely due more to insufficient coverage of the rain gauge network, particularly in the outskirts of the area being considered, than to the limited amount of data. For a proper investigation of the ARF dependence on area and duration, both a longer series and a better gauge distribution are necessary.
    • Download: (1.840Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Evaluation of the Areal Reduction Factor in an Urban Area through Rainfall Records of Limited Length: A Case Study

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/71804
    Collections
    • Journal of Hydrologic Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorGiuseppe Barbero
    contributor authorUgo Moisello
    contributor authorSara Todeschini
    date accessioned2017-05-08T22:07:27Z
    date available2017-05-08T22:07:27Z
    date copyrightNovember 2014
    date issued2014
    identifier other29906304.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/71804
    description abstractThis paper addresses the determination of the areal reduction factor (ARF) as a function of area and duration. The analysis is carried out using the data recorded in a 10-year period at the rainfall gauge network of the city of Milan (Italy). Four types of probability distributions [exponential, the extreme value type 1 (EV1), the generalized extreme value (GEV), and generalized Pareto], two parameter estimation methods (probability-weighted moments and partial probability-weighted moments), and four different regression models of ARF on area and duration are considered. A sensitivity analysis is carried out to outline the effect exerted on ARF by the choice of probability distribution and the parameter estimation method and by that of the model. The effect of model choice is more important than the choice of the distribution and estimation method. The models that fit the data best are the newly developed ones. The ARF model that has the best fit presents a root-mean-square error (RMSE) equal to 0.0204. This ARF error is very acceptable for practical purposes. The computed areal rainfall quantiles show inconsistencies, which are likely due more to insufficient coverage of the rain gauge network, particularly in the outskirts of the area being considered, than to the limited amount of data. For a proper investigation of the ARF dependence on area and duration, both a longer series and a better gauge distribution are necessary.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleEvaluation of the Areal Reduction Factor in an Urban Area through Rainfall Records of Limited Length: A Case Study
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume19
    journal issue11
    journal titleJournal of Hydrologic Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001022
    treeJournal of Hydrologic Engineering:;2014:;Volume ( 019 ):;issue: 011
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian