YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Nonlinear Soil–Foundation–Structure and Structure–Soil–Structure Interaction: Engineering Demands

    Source: Journal of Structural Engineering:;2015:;Volume ( 141 ):;issue: 007
    Author:
    Nicholas W. Trombetta
    ,
    H. Benjamin Mason
    ,
    Tara C. Hutchinson
    ,
    Joshua D. Zupan
    ,
    Jonathan D. Bray
    ,
    Bruce L. Kutter
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001127
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Two geotechnical centrifuge tests were designed to elicit the influence of soil–foundation–structure interaction (SFSI) and structure–soil–structure interaction (SSSI) effects on the seismic demands of an inelastic frame structure founded on individual spread footings. Four experimental cases were considered: (1) SFSI of an individual inelastic frame structure (baseline case); (2) in-plane SSSI between the frame structure and a large elastic wall structure designed to respond predominately in a rocking mode; (3) anti-plane SSSI between the frame and wall structures; and (4) combined in-plane and anti-plane SSSI between the frame structure and two wall structures. Results from Cases 1, 2, and 4 are analyzed considering 13 demand parameters. The peak seismic demands from the baseline case are compared to the peak demands from the SSSI cases to elicit the impacts of building adjacency. The number of earthquake motions that resulted in increases or decreases in the seismic demands in the frame structure are tracked for the SSSI cases. For these tests, SSSI consistently results in increased peak foundation moment and foundation base shear demands, regardless of the geometric layout of the structures. These increases propagate throughout the superstructure, resulting in increases in moment, shear and curvature ductility demands in the structural components. SSSI effects are observed to be most significant for low–to–moderate intensity earthquake motions, suggesting that particular consideration should be given to the likelihood of SSSI for highly probable earthquakes.
    • Download: (5.906Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Nonlinear Soil–Foundation–Structure and Structure–Soil–Structure Interaction: Engineering Demands

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/71665
    Collections
    • Journal of Structural Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorNicholas W. Trombetta
    contributor authorH. Benjamin Mason
    contributor authorTara C. Hutchinson
    contributor authorJoshua D. Zupan
    contributor authorJonathan D. Bray
    contributor authorBruce L. Kutter
    date accessioned2017-05-08T22:06:59Z
    date available2017-05-08T22:06:59Z
    date copyrightJuly 2015
    date issued2015
    identifier other29236986.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/71665
    description abstractTwo geotechnical centrifuge tests were designed to elicit the influence of soil–foundation–structure interaction (SFSI) and structure–soil–structure interaction (SSSI) effects on the seismic demands of an inelastic frame structure founded on individual spread footings. Four experimental cases were considered: (1) SFSI of an individual inelastic frame structure (baseline case); (2) in-plane SSSI between the frame structure and a large elastic wall structure designed to respond predominately in a rocking mode; (3) anti-plane SSSI between the frame and wall structures; and (4) combined in-plane and anti-plane SSSI between the frame structure and two wall structures. Results from Cases 1, 2, and 4 are analyzed considering 13 demand parameters. The peak seismic demands from the baseline case are compared to the peak demands from the SSSI cases to elicit the impacts of building adjacency. The number of earthquake motions that resulted in increases or decreases in the seismic demands in the frame structure are tracked for the SSSI cases. For these tests, SSSI consistently results in increased peak foundation moment and foundation base shear demands, regardless of the geometric layout of the structures. These increases propagate throughout the superstructure, resulting in increases in moment, shear and curvature ductility demands in the structural components. SSSI effects are observed to be most significant for low–to–moderate intensity earthquake motions, suggesting that particular consideration should be given to the likelihood of SSSI for highly probable earthquakes.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleNonlinear Soil–Foundation–Structure and Structure–Soil–Structure Interaction: Engineering Demands
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume141
    journal issue7
    journal titleJournal of Structural Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001127
    treeJournal of Structural Engineering:;2015:;Volume ( 141 ):;issue: 007
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian