YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Evaluation of Stakeholder Utility Risk Caused by the Objective Functions in Multipurpose Multireservoir Systems

    Source: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;2015:;Volume ( 141 ):;issue: 002
    Author:
    Elahe Fallah-Mehdipour
    ,
    Omid Bozorg Haddad
    ,
    Miguel A. Mariño
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000785
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Optimal operation of reservoir systems is a challenging task in water resource management, involving stakeholders with different utilities. These utilities are conflicting, especially in a multireservoir system when the number of stakeholders increases compared to a single-reservoir system. A reservoir system with hydropower energy generation and supplying downstream demands is an example of these challenges. An appropriate objective framework can improve mitigation of stakeholder conflicts. This paper considers a 1-year optimal operation of a multireservoir system, with two parallel upstream reservoirs and a downstream reservoir in series. System objectives are hydropower energy generation as well as supplying downstream demands. Existing conflicts of this system are determined in single-objective reservoir operation models. The mathematical form of objective functions can limit utility risk in multiobjective problems. To overcome impacts of existing conflicts, a simulation model has been coupled with the weighting method and Nash equilibrium in multiobjective models. Results show that although the calculated objectives using the Nash equilibrium are less (worse) than the maximum (best) values of the objective function with the largest weight for the first (highest) objective priority using the weighting method, in two parallel reservoirs the values of the objective function are larger (better), about 70.83 and 54.17%, respectively, for hydropower energy generation and supplying downstream demands objectives. Moreover, these objectives calculated by the Nash equilibrium are 58.33 and 50% better, respectively, than same values by the weighting method in series reservoirs. Thus, utilities were significantly balanced and increased from the worst (minimum) utility values by the Nash equilibrium. The Nash equilibrium increases considerably the reliability value for all stakeholders at the same time.
    • Download: (1.521Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Evaluation of Stakeholder Utility Risk Caused by the Objective Functions in Multipurpose Multireservoir Systems

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/71461
    Collections
    • Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorElahe Fallah-Mehdipour
    contributor authorOmid Bozorg Haddad
    contributor authorMiguel A. Mariño
    date accessioned2017-05-08T22:06:22Z
    date available2017-05-08T22:06:22Z
    date copyrightFebruary 2015
    date issued2015
    identifier other28225706.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/71461
    description abstractOptimal operation of reservoir systems is a challenging task in water resource management, involving stakeholders with different utilities. These utilities are conflicting, especially in a multireservoir system when the number of stakeholders increases compared to a single-reservoir system. A reservoir system with hydropower energy generation and supplying downstream demands is an example of these challenges. An appropriate objective framework can improve mitigation of stakeholder conflicts. This paper considers a 1-year optimal operation of a multireservoir system, with two parallel upstream reservoirs and a downstream reservoir in series. System objectives are hydropower energy generation as well as supplying downstream demands. Existing conflicts of this system are determined in single-objective reservoir operation models. The mathematical form of objective functions can limit utility risk in multiobjective problems. To overcome impacts of existing conflicts, a simulation model has been coupled with the weighting method and Nash equilibrium in multiobjective models. Results show that although the calculated objectives using the Nash equilibrium are less (worse) than the maximum (best) values of the objective function with the largest weight for the first (highest) objective priority using the weighting method, in two parallel reservoirs the values of the objective function are larger (better), about 70.83 and 54.17%, respectively, for hydropower energy generation and supplying downstream demands objectives. Moreover, these objectives calculated by the Nash equilibrium are 58.33 and 50% better, respectively, than same values by the weighting method in series reservoirs. Thus, utilities were significantly balanced and increased from the worst (minimum) utility values by the Nash equilibrium. The Nash equilibrium increases considerably the reliability value for all stakeholders at the same time.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleEvaluation of Stakeholder Utility Risk Caused by the Objective Functions in Multipurpose Multireservoir Systems
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume141
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000785
    treeJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;2015:;Volume ( 141 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian