YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Neural Networks for River Flow Prediction

    Source: Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering:;1994:;Volume ( 008 ):;issue: 002
    Author:
    Nachimuthu Karunanithi
    ,
    William J. Grenney
    ,
    Darrell Whitley
    ,
    Ken Bovee
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(1994)8:2(201)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: The surface‐water hydrographs of rivers exhibit large variations due to many natural phenomena. One of the most commonly used approaches for interpolating and extending streamflow records is to fit observed data with an analytic power model. However, such analytic models may not adequately represent the flow process, because they are based on many simplifying assumptions about the natural phenomena that influence the river flow. This paper demonstrates how a neural network can be used as an adaptive model synthesizer as well as a predictor. Issues such as selecting an appropriate neural network architecture and a correct training algorithm as well as presenting data to neural networks are addressed using a constructive algorithm called the cascade‐correlation algorithm. The neural‐network approach is applied to the flow prediction of the Huron River at the Dexter sampling station, near Ann Arbor, Mich. Empirical comparisons are performed between the predictive capability of the neural network models and the most commonly used analytic nonlinear power model in terms of accuracy and convenience of use. Our preliminary results are quite encouraging. An analysis performed on the structure of the networks developed by the cascade‐correlation algorithm shows that the neural networks are capable of adapting their complexity to match changes in the flow history and that the models developed by the neural‐network approach are more complex than the power model.
    • Download: (1.101Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Neural Networks for River Flow Prediction

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/71034
    Collections
    • Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorNachimuthu Karunanithi
    contributor authorWilliam J. Grenney
    contributor authorDarrell Whitley
    contributor authorKen Bovee
    date accessioned2017-05-08T22:05:24Z
    date available2017-05-08T22:05:24Z
    date copyrightApril 1994
    date issued1994
    identifier other22107211.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/71034
    description abstractThe surface‐water hydrographs of rivers exhibit large variations due to many natural phenomena. One of the most commonly used approaches for interpolating and extending streamflow records is to fit observed data with an analytic power model. However, such analytic models may not adequately represent the flow process, because they are based on many simplifying assumptions about the natural phenomena that influence the river flow. This paper demonstrates how a neural network can be used as an adaptive model synthesizer as well as a predictor. Issues such as selecting an appropriate neural network architecture and a correct training algorithm as well as presenting data to neural networks are addressed using a constructive algorithm called the cascade‐correlation algorithm. The neural‐network approach is applied to the flow prediction of the Huron River at the Dexter sampling station, near Ann Arbor, Mich. Empirical comparisons are performed between the predictive capability of the neural network models and the most commonly used analytic nonlinear power model in terms of accuracy and convenience of use. Our preliminary results are quite encouraging. An analysis performed on the structure of the networks developed by the cascade‐correlation algorithm shows that the neural networks are capable of adapting their complexity to match changes in the flow history and that the models developed by the neural‐network approach are more complex than the power model.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleNeural Networks for River Flow Prediction
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume8
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Computing in Civil Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(1994)8:2(201)
    treeJournal of Computing in Civil Engineering:;1994:;Volume ( 008 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian