Methods for Defining Spatiotemporal Influence Areas and Secondary Incident Detection in FreewaysSource: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems:;2014:;Volume ( 140 ):;issue: 001Author:Maria-Ioanna M. Imprialou
,
Foteini P. Orfanou
,
Eleni I. Vlahogianni
,
Matthew G. Karlaftis
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000612Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Abstract: The likelihood of the occurrence of secondary incidents is usually linked to primary incidents by using predefined spatial and temporal criteria. This paper extends past research on secondary incident detection by defining the dynamic thresholds of the influence area of a primary incident, using detailed freeway traffic data from upstream loop detectors. The dynamic thresholds are defined by using both analytical and empirical approaches. Results that use analytical approaches to track the spatiotemporal boundaries of the influence upstream of a primary incident offer influence curves of different characteristics (influence duration and maximum spatial extent) with respect to the prevailing traffic conditions. To accurately detect secondary incidents, an empirical method based on spatiotemporal speed evolution is applied that imprints influence areas with respect to their dissipation patterns. The results of the proposed approach are compared to those of five commonly used static and dynamic methods for detecting secondary incidents. Their differences are identified and discussed.
|
Show full item record
contributor author | Maria-Ioanna M. Imprialou | |
contributor author | Foteini P. Orfanou | |
contributor author | Eleni I. Vlahogianni | |
contributor author | Matthew G. Karlaftis | |
date accessioned | 2017-05-08T22:02:36Z | |
date available | 2017-05-08T22:02:36Z | |
date copyright | January 2014 | |
date issued | 2014 | |
identifier other | %28asce%29up%2E1943-5444%2E0000023.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/69641 | |
description abstract | The likelihood of the occurrence of secondary incidents is usually linked to primary incidents by using predefined spatial and temporal criteria. This paper extends past research on secondary incident detection by defining the dynamic thresholds of the influence area of a primary incident, using detailed freeway traffic data from upstream loop detectors. The dynamic thresholds are defined by using both analytical and empirical approaches. Results that use analytical approaches to track the spatiotemporal boundaries of the influence upstream of a primary incident offer influence curves of different characteristics (influence duration and maximum spatial extent) with respect to the prevailing traffic conditions. To accurately detect secondary incidents, an empirical method based on spatiotemporal speed evolution is applied that imprints influence areas with respect to their dissipation patterns. The results of the proposed approach are compared to those of five commonly used static and dynamic methods for detecting secondary incidents. Their differences are identified and discussed. | |
publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
title | Methods for Defining Spatiotemporal Influence Areas and Secondary Incident Detection in Freeways | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 140 | |
journal issue | 1 | |
journal title | Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems | |
identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000612 | |
tree | Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems:;2014:;Volume ( 140 ):;issue: 001 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |