YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Framework for Multiobjective Optimization of Physical Highway Assets Investments

    Source: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems:;2012:;Volume ( 138 ):;issue: 012
    Author:
    Zheng Wu
    ,
    Gerardo Flintsch
    ,
    Adelino Ferreira
    ,
    Luís de Picado-Santos
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000458
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Optimization-based tools have been included in many engineering management systems for individual infrastructure asset classes such as pavement management systems (PMS) and bridge management systems (BMS). These tools typically include single-objective optimization analyses. However, real-world decisions concerning asset preservation and renewal often involve more than one objective reflecting the various goals of the agency and need to evaluate possible alternatives according to multiple criteria. Traditional single-objective optimization approaches for handling such situations optimize a selected most important objective while either neglecting the less important competing objectives or imposing them as known constraints in the optimization formulation. This approach often does not provide truly optimal solutions. Multiobjective optimization formulations have clear theoretical advantages but increase the complexity of the mathematical formulation. This paper presents a review of the application of multiobjective optimization techniques in various working levels of highway asset management. Some promising techniques for the different infrastructure management functions are identified, and relevant characteristics are summarized and compared. Based on the applications reviewed, it can be concluded that multiobjective optimization could be effective for supporting many infrastructure management business processes. The review also suggests that a synergistic integration of complementary techniques may help develop practical and efficient decision-supporting tools that take advantage of the benefits and avoid potential drawbacks of the individual techniques.
    • Download: (1.198Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Framework for Multiobjective Optimization of Physical Highway Assets Investments

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/69477
    Collections
    • Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems

    Show full item record

    contributor authorZheng Wu
    contributor authorGerardo Flintsch
    contributor authorAdelino Ferreira
    contributor authorLuís de Picado-Santos
    date accessioned2017-05-08T22:02:17Z
    date available2017-05-08T22:02:17Z
    date copyrightDecember 2012
    date issued2012
    identifier other%28asce%29te%2E1943-5436%2E0000501.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/69477
    description abstractOptimization-based tools have been included in many engineering management systems for individual infrastructure asset classes such as pavement management systems (PMS) and bridge management systems (BMS). These tools typically include single-objective optimization analyses. However, real-world decisions concerning asset preservation and renewal often involve more than one objective reflecting the various goals of the agency and need to evaluate possible alternatives according to multiple criteria. Traditional single-objective optimization approaches for handling such situations optimize a selected most important objective while either neglecting the less important competing objectives or imposing them as known constraints in the optimization formulation. This approach often does not provide truly optimal solutions. Multiobjective optimization formulations have clear theoretical advantages but increase the complexity of the mathematical formulation. This paper presents a review of the application of multiobjective optimization techniques in various working levels of highway asset management. Some promising techniques for the different infrastructure management functions are identified, and relevant characteristics are summarized and compared. Based on the applications reviewed, it can be concluded that multiobjective optimization could be effective for supporting many infrastructure management business processes. The review also suggests that a synergistic integration of complementary techniques may help develop practical and efficient decision-supporting tools that take advantage of the benefits and avoid potential drawbacks of the individual techniques.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleFramework for Multiobjective Optimization of Physical Highway Assets Investments
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume138
    journal issue12
    journal titleJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000458
    treeJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems:;2012:;Volume ( 138 ):;issue: 012
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian