YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Multinomial Logistic Regression Model for Single-Vehicle and Multivehicle Collisions on Urban U.S. Highways in Arkansas

    Source: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems:;2012:;Volume ( 138 ):;issue: 006
    Author:
    Ghulam H. Bham
    ,
    Bhanu S. Javvadi
    ,
    Uday R. R. Manepalli
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000370
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Multivariate analysis can be used to identify the effects of several factors on the causes of a crash compared with univariate analysis. This paper uses a multivariate-analysis technique, the multinomial logistic regression (MLR) model, to examine the differences in crash-contributing factors for six collision types for both divided- and undivided-highway nonjunctions, given that a crash has occurred. Multinomial logistic regression was used to investigate (1) single-vehicle and (2) multivehicle collisions, which included (1) angular, (2) head-on, (3) rear-end, (4) sideswipe-same-direction, and (5) sideswipe-opposite-direction collisions. The risks associated with different collision types were found to be significantly influenced by various vehicle actions. The risk of sideswipe-same-direction collisions was higher while changing lanes and merging on undivided and divided highways. Similarly, while merging, drivers were prone to angular collisions, and when slowing down to rear-end collisions on undivided and divided highways. On weekdays, there was higher risk of multivehicle collisions, whereas on weekends, single-vehicle collisions were found to be statistically significant. The risk of single-vehicle collisions attributable to drivers negotiating a curve, driving on a wet road surface, during nighttime, when vision was obscured, avoiding objects on the roadway, and driving under the influence of alcohol was higher compared with that of other collision types. On the basis of the results of the analysis, it was found that the risk of single-vehicle collisions was higher on divided and undivided highways compared with other collision types. Further, binary logistic regression model was used to identify the factors that contribute to crash-injury severity, given that a crash has occurred. Drivers and passengers who did not wear lap and shoulder belts, and drove under the influence of alcohol were involved in serious crash injuries. Drivers involved in a crash on horizontal and vertical curves were prone to severe crash injuries compared with crashes on straight and level roadways. Head-on and single-vehicle collisions were found to be at a higher risk for severe injuries compared with other collision types. Additionally, collision types were strongly related to driver behavior (decision making) parameters, such as merging, changing lanes, and slowing/stopping, compared with parameters such as roadway geometry, atmospheric conditions, and surface conditions. From these results, the importance of different statistical techniques is evident, as the significant variables varied for crash severity and different collision types.
    • Download: (302.7Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Multinomial Logistic Regression Model for Single-Vehicle and Multivehicle Collisions on Urban U.S. Highways in Arkansas

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/69380
    Collections
    • Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems

    Show full item record

    contributor authorGhulam H. Bham
    contributor authorBhanu S. Javvadi
    contributor authorUday R. R. Manepalli
    date accessioned2017-05-08T22:02:09Z
    date available2017-05-08T22:02:09Z
    date copyrightJune 2012
    date issued2012
    identifier other%28asce%29te%2E1943-5436%2E0000412.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/69380
    description abstractMultivariate analysis can be used to identify the effects of several factors on the causes of a crash compared with univariate analysis. This paper uses a multivariate-analysis technique, the multinomial logistic regression (MLR) model, to examine the differences in crash-contributing factors for six collision types for both divided- and undivided-highway nonjunctions, given that a crash has occurred. Multinomial logistic regression was used to investigate (1) single-vehicle and (2) multivehicle collisions, which included (1) angular, (2) head-on, (3) rear-end, (4) sideswipe-same-direction, and (5) sideswipe-opposite-direction collisions. The risks associated with different collision types were found to be significantly influenced by various vehicle actions. The risk of sideswipe-same-direction collisions was higher while changing lanes and merging on undivided and divided highways. Similarly, while merging, drivers were prone to angular collisions, and when slowing down to rear-end collisions on undivided and divided highways. On weekdays, there was higher risk of multivehicle collisions, whereas on weekends, single-vehicle collisions were found to be statistically significant. The risk of single-vehicle collisions attributable to drivers negotiating a curve, driving on a wet road surface, during nighttime, when vision was obscured, avoiding objects on the roadway, and driving under the influence of alcohol was higher compared with that of other collision types. On the basis of the results of the analysis, it was found that the risk of single-vehicle collisions was higher on divided and undivided highways compared with other collision types. Further, binary logistic regression model was used to identify the factors that contribute to crash-injury severity, given that a crash has occurred. Drivers and passengers who did not wear lap and shoulder belts, and drove under the influence of alcohol were involved in serious crash injuries. Drivers involved in a crash on horizontal and vertical curves were prone to severe crash injuries compared with crashes on straight and level roadways. Head-on and single-vehicle collisions were found to be at a higher risk for severe injuries compared with other collision types. Additionally, collision types were strongly related to driver behavior (decision making) parameters, such as merging, changing lanes, and slowing/stopping, compared with parameters such as roadway geometry, atmospheric conditions, and surface conditions. From these results, the importance of different statistical techniques is evident, as the significant variables varied for crash severity and different collision types.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleMultinomial Logistic Regression Model for Single-Vehicle and Multivehicle Collisions on Urban U.S. Highways in Arkansas
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume138
    journal issue6
    journal titleJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000370
    treeJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems:;2012:;Volume ( 138 ):;issue: 006
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian