YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Seismic Response of Single-Degree-of-Freedom Systems Representing Low-Ductility Steel Concentrically Braced Frames with Reserve Capacity

    Source: Journal of Structural Engineering:;2013:;Volume ( 139 ):;issue: 002
    Author:
    Gang
    ,
    Li
    ,
    Larry A.
    ,
    Fahnestock
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000623
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Steel concentrically braced frames (CBFs) are used widely as a seismic lateral force–resisting system. Although modern CBFs designed for high seismic regions have considerable ductility, CBFs in moderate seismic regions are expected to have limited ductility, even when designed using modern provisions. In addition, older CBFs in high seismic regions also are expected to have limited ductility. In these low-ductility systems, reserve capacity (i.e., secondary strength and stiffness) plays an important role in seismic collapse prevention. Thus, quantifying the impact of reserve capacity on earthquake response for low-ductility systems is critical. This paper presents research that used single-degree-of-freedom systems to represent low-ductility CBFs, where brace fracture causes a sudden loss of strength and stiffness. Postbrace fracture stability was studied by considering variations in reserve system strength and stiffness parameters. Performance was evaluated by considering local ductility demands on the reserve system and global drift demands. For the cases considered, the ductility capacity of the reserve system was typically a more critical constraint than global drift capacity. Reserve capacity is demonstrated to appreciably influence seismic collapse behavior, whereas primary system strength has a small influence.
    • Download: (1.744Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Seismic Response of Single-Degree-of-Freedom Systems Representing Low-Ductility Steel Concentrically Braced Frames with Reserve Capacity

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/68546
    Collections
    • Journal of Structural Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorGang
    contributor authorLi
    contributor authorLarry A.
    contributor authorFahnestock
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:59:59Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:59:59Z
    date copyrightFebruary 2013
    date issued2013
    identifier other%28asce%29st%2E1943-541x%2E0000664.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/68546
    description abstractSteel concentrically braced frames (CBFs) are used widely as a seismic lateral force–resisting system. Although modern CBFs designed for high seismic regions have considerable ductility, CBFs in moderate seismic regions are expected to have limited ductility, even when designed using modern provisions. In addition, older CBFs in high seismic regions also are expected to have limited ductility. In these low-ductility systems, reserve capacity (i.e., secondary strength and stiffness) plays an important role in seismic collapse prevention. Thus, quantifying the impact of reserve capacity on earthquake response for low-ductility systems is critical. This paper presents research that used single-degree-of-freedom systems to represent low-ductility CBFs, where brace fracture causes a sudden loss of strength and stiffness. Postbrace fracture stability was studied by considering variations in reserve system strength and stiffness parameters. Performance was evaluated by considering local ductility demands on the reserve system and global drift demands. For the cases considered, the ductility capacity of the reserve system was typically a more critical constraint than global drift capacity. Reserve capacity is demonstrated to appreciably influence seismic collapse behavior, whereas primary system strength has a small influence.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleSeismic Response of Single-Degree-of-Freedom Systems Representing Low-Ductility Steel Concentrically Braced Frames with Reserve Capacity
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume139
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Structural Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000623
    treeJournal of Structural Engineering:;2013:;Volume ( 139 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian